Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has found himself in an awkward position following President Donald Trump’s recent executive order on glyphosate, a chemical long criticized for its potential health risks. Two years ago, Kennedy made headlines by labeling glyphosate a significant factor in “America’s chronic disease epidemic.” Now, he is tasked with defending Trump’s move to bolster its production, a decision that has caused ripples among those who supported his Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda.
The executive order, described by Trump as essential for national defense, underscores glyphosate’s role as “a cornerstone” of U.S. agricultural productivity. This directive elicited sharp reactions from advocates who push for healthier food systems. Many considered the order a betrayal of MAHA motives, prompting intense backlash from figures within that movement. Kelly Ryerson, co-executive director of American Regeneration and an influential voice in MAHA, noted that this action “betrays the very MAHA voters who put this administration in power,” illustrating a growing rift over the administration’s agricultural policies.
Kennedy had previously stated that glyphosate’s widespread use in America, particularly its application as a desiccant on wheat, presents a significant health risk. He vowed during his presidential campaign in 2024 to ban these practices, further complicating his current position. His earlier remarks highlighted serious concerns, with Kennedy declaring, “The herbicide Glyphosate is one of the likely culprits in America’s chronic disease epidemic.” His change of stance since taking office reflects the challenges inherent in reconciling health advocacy with the demands of agricultural and national security priorities.
The MAHA Commission, tasked with investigating chronic health challenges, has echoed these concerns. A report released in May 2025 discussed the potential links between glyphosate and a range of adverse health outcomes. It cited studies hinting at connections to serious issues like reproductive and developmental disorders, including cancers and metabolic disturbances. These findings add weight to Kennedy’s previous claims and serve as evidence of the conflict between the MAHA objectives and the executive order’s agricultural underpinnings.
While supporters of glyphosate celebrate Trump’s decision, figures within the MAHA movement feel conflicted. Alex Clark, a podcast host connected with Turning Point USA, articulated the emotional turmoil felt within the community, likening it to “going through a breakup.” This sentiment captures the sense of disillusionment among those who rallied behind the promise of improved health and safety.
In an effort to navigate the backlash, Kennedy has framed the executive order not only as a matter of agricultural production but as an issue of national security. He emphasized to Fox News Digital the necessity of safeguarding America’s food supply from foreign control. “When hostile actors control critical inputs, they weaken our security,” Kennedy asserted, seeking to align his administration’s actions with a broader theme of protection for American families.
The tension surrounding this decision represents a pivotal moment for the MAHA coalition. As leaders within this movement express discontent with the administration, Kennedy must balance his role as a health advocate with the realities of agriculture and national defense. The next steps taken by the administration will be critical in solidifying its stance on public health issues as it attempts to maintain its commitment to both agricultural productivity and the health of Americans.
This situation exemplifies the complex interplay of agriculture, health, and security policy, highlighting the delicate compromises that often define political leadership. Kennedy’s actions and the administration’s responses will be closely watched as the ramifications of this executive order unfold.
"*" indicates required fields
