Sen. Ashley Moody (R-FL) unleashed pointed criticism on Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison during a Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing, drawing attention to his controversial past. The exchange focused heavily on Ellison’s 2018 tweet where he posed with a copy of “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” which many argue demonstrates his support for Antifa, a group labeled as violent and extremist.
Moody confronted Ellison directly, stating, “The Trump administration said they have removed from your state 10,000 people that were here illegally, that had criminal backgrounds. Is that a good thing or a bad thing?” When Ellison cast doubt on the claim, she doubled down, asking, “They have removed tens of thousands of people across the country that are here illegally, that have committed crimes and have a criminal background. Is that a good thing or a bad thing?” This line of questioning set the tone for a combative back and forth.
Taking a strong stance, Moody challenged Ellison’s belief that deportations should only occur after a conviction for serious crimes. She underscored the inherent risks of such a position, suggesting that it endangers communities. Eyebrows raised, she pointed out that only a handful of counties in Minnesota cooperated with the Trump administration on deportations, contrasting that sharply with Florida, where every county is signed up to assist federal efforts. “Would it surprise you that Florida has every one of our counties signed up to help the administration rid our communities of those who are here illegally committing crimes?” she asked, asserting how this reflects poorly on Ellison’s leadership.
With conviction, Moody claimed, “All of these problems in Minnesota exist because you have a top cop that won’t help rid its community of those here illegally committing crimes. You know what? The tale of two states? A tale of two attorney generals in how this is all playing out?” Her rhetoric painted a stark picture of contrast between Minnesota and Florida’s approaches to law enforcement and illegal immigration.
As the discussion wore on, Moody made it clear that she held Ellison accountable for the chaos in his state. “It should surprise no one in this country that the problems we have had in your state are a result of a top cop not working with law enforcement to make its community safe,” she snapped, underscoring the critical importance of collaboration between local and federal authorities in maintaining public safety.
Then came the decisive moment when Moody tied the Antifa connection back into the discussion: “You can’t have an attorney [who is pictured] supporting Antifa with an expectation you are going to have a civilized, stable, safe community that works with federal law enforcement to deport criminals here illegally committing crime.” Her statement resonated deeply, emphasizing the need for a cohesive law enforcement strategy that aligns leadership with the safety of the community.
In a heartfelt appeal, she added, “As the wife of a law enforcement officer, I think that is a shame, and your state deserves better.” This personal touch illustrated her position and highlighted the disconnect between Ellison’s policies and the needs of officers on the ground. The exchange was marked by passionate arguments and a clear divide in philosophies regarding public safety, law enforcement cooperation, and the treatment of illegal immigrants in the U.S.
In summary, Moody’s fiery critiques of Ellison centered on both his past associations and current policies, presenting a case that linked leadership effectiveness directly to community safety. The hearing showcased how the defense of law enforcement and accountability in government can clash dramatically with differing political ideologies. Moody’s performance illustrated a raw and urgent demand for responsible governance that prioritizes security and safety above all else.
"*" indicates required fields
