Just before the final shuttle mission in 2001, the question of returning to the Moon seemed simple. How could it take almost a decade to leap from one space program to another after NASA’s historic lunar landings of the late 60s and early 70s? The answer lies in years of shifting priorities and leadership failures that have plagued NASA’s ambitions. Now, a quarter of a century later, NASA is finally gearing up for that leap again, this time through the Artemis program.
The details are significant. The Space Launch System has rolled out to the launch pad, and Artemis II is set to send four astronauts on a ten-day test flight, nearly 5,000 miles beyond the Moon. This mission marks the first time since Apollo 17 in 1972 that humans will venture toward the lunar vicinity. NASA has faced many challenges, but the drive to return to the Moon—with its promises of valuable resources—has remained strong.
President Donald Trump’s administration laid the groundwork for this mission, directing NASA to spearhead a return to the Moon. However, delays caused by technical issues and funding struggles have hindered progress. Artemis II will not land on the Moon, but it will serve a critical purpose—testing life support systems and ensuring that all systems can withstand the harsh conditions of cislunar space. As the crew prepares to rely on the new Orion spacecraft, they face high stakes. Any problem could lead to an emergency return that might take days.
Technical hurdles are not hypothetical. In 2022, during an uncrewed test flight, Orion’s heat shield failed to perform as expected; rather than experiencing a smooth degradation upon reentry, it shed chunks of material due to trapped gases. This has prompted mission planners to rethink the reentry path for Artemis II to avoid similar issues. Jared Isaacman, NASA’s current administrator, has given the green light for the mission, underscoring the importance of technical success for securing ongoing funding.
Looking ahead, the future of lunar landings remains uncertain. SpaceX was chosen to provide the lander for Artemis III, but the company has faced various delays in its test launches. This means time is of the essence as NASA contemplates alternate designs. With China advancing rapidly in its lunar program and aiming to send taikonauts to the Moon by 2030, competition for the Moon’s resources is heating up.
China has shifted quickly, testing its heavy-lift rocket and command craft while also developing its lunar lander. If they succeed in another Moon landing before NASA, it will not just be a technical triumph but a significant propaganda win for the Chinese Communist Party. Competing for resources such as water may require a rethinking of NASA’s approach as well.
As things stand, Artemis II’s upcoming mission will be a landmark event—taking three Americans and a Canadian around the Moon for the first time in over half a century. Yet establishing a lasting human presence on the Moon will demand a robust plan for future missions. NASA must focus on the Artemis III lander design and seek solutions that can be implemented promptly to avoid falling behind. The time for decisive leadership is now; without it, the goal of returning to the Moon—an objective considered within reach—could slip further away. NASA must demonstrate that it has the capacity to lead once more, not just to the Moon but into the greater expanse of space beyond.
"*" indicates required fields
