The latest Olympic judging controversy draws parallels to past scandals, highlighting the recurrent theme of bias in competitive sports. In a judgment that echoes the infamous 2002 Salt Lake City scandal, French judge Jezabel Dabouis is back in the spotlight following questionable scoring in the ice dancing event at the 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Olympics.
At the center of this controversy are French duo Laurence Fournier Beaudry and Guillaume Cizeron, who emerged victorious against American skaters Madison Chock and Evan Bates. Beaudry and Cizeron clinched the gold with a total of 225.82 points, just ahead of the Americans at 224.39. Yet, Dabouis’ scoring drew skepticism after she awarded the French team an astonishing 7.71 points more in the free dance segment, despite them failing to execute their synchronized twizzles effectively. The unusual disparity between the scores raises eyebrows, particularly as Dabouis was the only judge to give the French pair over 130 points while denying the Americans a similar score despite their strong performance.
This pattern of questionable judging is not unprecedented. It harks back to the turn of the millennium when the legitimacy of Olympic judging was called into question during the Salt Lake City Games. At that time, French judge Marie-Reine Le Gougne infamously stated she was told to rank the Russian pair first in exchange for favorable scores. Although she later recanted her claims, the scandal led to an international investigation and the nullification of scores, resulting in a second gold medal awarded to the Canadian couple. The consequences were severe, with both judges banned and the integrity of the sport badly damaged.
Fast forward to the present, and while the International Skating Union remains committed to upholding fairness, skepticism persists. According to an ISU spokesperson, “It is normal for there to be a range of scores,” reflecting an intent to mitigate bias. Yet the case of Beaudry and Cizeron intensifies scrutiny, especially since the latter has been recently embroiled in controversy surrounding personal allegations against him and his partner.
Despite the apparent systemic issues, reactions from the figure skating community are telling. Critics are vocal, such as French-Estonian skater Solene Mazingue, who lamented that “a missed twizzle won’t stop you from winning Olympic gold.” American journalist Rodger Sherman pointedly commented that if such a biased score is possible, then the entire judging system is inherently flawed.
Chock and Bates, for their part, approached the controversy with grace, acknowledging the subjective nature of their sport. Bates remarked on the unpredictability of competition, observing, “It’s a subjective sport. It’s a judged sport.” Chock called their silver medal finish “bittersweet,” expressing pride in their performances despite the outcome.
This saga reflects a broader anxiety surrounding the integrity of judged sports. With the past looming large, it serves as a reminder: mistakes and bias can tarnish even the most prestigious athletic events. The specter of history lingers, suggesting that future Olympic judging controversies may not be far behind, particularly as the global sports community watches and waits.
"*" indicates required fields
