A proposed ban on hunting and ranching in Oregon is generating significant controversy. The initiative, known as Initiative Petition 28, aims to drastically change how the state views animal protections. Organizers have gathered approximately 105,000 signatures, edging closer to the 117,713 needed to secure a spot on the ballot this November.
David Michelson, the campaign’s leader, laid out the vision of the measure: if it passes, Oregon would become the first state to extend pet-like protections to wild animals and livestock. Supporters framed this proposal as the PEACE Act, standing for the People for the Elimination of Animal Cruelty Exemptions. Michelson stated, “We really want to make Oregon the first state to vote on something like this.” However, he acknowledged the uphill battle, saying, “We are aware that it’s unlikely 50 percent of Oregonians are ready right now to move away from killing animals.” His intent is to spark a broader conversation about animal rights and welfare.
Opponents of the ban are not taking the threat lightly. Amy Patrick, representing the Oregon Hunters Association, expressed concerns that a decision to vote “yes” could adversely affect the state’s economy and its cultural heritage. “Part of that is our wildlife. And part of that is our economy that comes from our farming and ranching,” she emphasized. Patrick urged voters to consider the implications not just for hunters and ranchers, but for all Oregonians.
Economic data underscores the weight of these concerns. An Oregon State University report suggests that cattle ranching contributes more than $900 million annually to the state’s economy. With approximately 15 million acres supporting cattle grazing, the livelihoods tied to ranching are substantial. Levi Barrera, president of the Oregon Hunters Association Hoodview Chapter, echoed these sentiments. He warned that curtailing hunting would lead to unchecked animal populations, which could exacerbate economic struggles in communities that depend on hunting and fishing.
In response to worries about wildlife overpopulation, Michelson suggested that the PEACE Act would include measures for non-lethal wildlife management, like introducing sterile males to control populations. He pointed out a commitment to assist those impacted by the potential shift from traditional hunting practices, proposing a transition fund.
As prices for beef remain steep, these discussions have broader implications. Recent statements from the Trump administration revealed that the U.S. cattle herd has reached a record low, influencing beef prices. Ground beef recently peaked at an average of $6.69 per pound, the highest in decades. This economic backdrop complicates the narrative, as many consumers face rising costs for essential goods.
The debates surrounding Initiative Petition 28 reflect a profound rift in Oregon’s approach to wildlife management and animal rights. Both sides of this contentious issue see the stakes clearly: for some, animal rights are paramount, while for others, the economic viability of ranching and hunting traditions must be preserved. As the election approaches, it appears that Oregonians will have to weigh these divergent perspectives carefully.
"*" indicates required fields
