New York City’s decision to appoint Phylisa Wisdom as its antisemitism czar has sparked intense debate about the role of leadership in addressing complex issues surrounding Jewish safety and identity. Wisdom’s past comments, especially regarding her reactions to Israel and Hamas, raise questions about her commitment to the role she now embodies.
During her tenure as executive director of the Mayor’s Office to Combat Antisemitism, Wisdom criticized then-candidate Andrew Yang for his strong condemnation of Hamas following rocket attacks on Israel. She stated, “As an American Jew and a New Yorker, I am floored by this tweet (although never surprised),” referring to Yang’s expressions of support for Israel. Her response highlighted a sentiment suggesting that she prioritizes Palestinian grievances over acknowledgment of threats facing Israeli citizens. This critical tone raises red flags for those concerned about the balance between supporting Jewish safety and addressing Palestinian issues.
Wisdom’s previous admission of missing Yom Kippur, the holiest day in Judaism, adds another layer of complexity to her appointment. She tweeted, “I totally missed Yom Kippur this year… I’ll repent next year???” Such remarks could lead to perceptions of a disconnect from the very community she is meant to represent. Critics question if an individual who seemingly trivializes significant Jewish practices can effectively advocate for Jewish safety.
Despite her claim of being a “liberal Zionist” and supporting a two-state solution, Wisdom’s history points to criticism of Israel’s military strategies. Middle East Forum Fellow Yuval David expressed apprehensions, stating, “Zionism is not politics but identity, history, and survival of the Jewish people.” He warned that her views could alienate the Orthodox Jewish community in New York, which maintains a strong connection to Zionist ideals and is often at odds with secular critiques of Israel.
Rabbi Marc Schneier emphasized a fundamental truth: the inseparability of Israel from Jewish identity. He pointed out that Wisdom’s opposition to the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which is recognized by numerous nations and states, casts doubt on her suitability for the role. If an antisemitism czar does not recognize the complexities of Jewish identities and experiences, it limits their efficacy.
As Mayor Mamdani stands by Wisdom, he calls her a “principled and effective leader.” His defense suggests a commitment to an administration that mirrors his critical stance towards Israel. This context could hinder community trust, particularly among those who fear that political biases could compromise effective advocacy for Jewish safety in a climate where antisemitic incidents are reportedly on the rise.
The challenges ahead for Wisdom and the administration are steep. With rising hatred and fear among Jewish communities, the effectiveness of this appointment will be closely scrutinized. Striking a balance between diverse voices while ensuring Jewish safety is paramount. As her tenure continues, the need for clear communication and genuine representation of Jewish identities will be critical in rebuilding trust and advancing efforts to combat antisemitism in New York City.
"*" indicates required fields
