The recent launch of Restore Britain, a national-conservative movement, marks a significant shift in the political landscape. Spearheaded by Independent MP Rupert Lowe, this initiative aims to address Britain’s pressing immigration crisis with a decisive plan: the policy paper titled "Mass Deportations: Legitimacy, Legality, and Logistics".
This 100-page document lays out a comprehensive approach to remove illegal migrants from the country. Prioritizing clarity and legality, the plan asserts that Britain faces an influx of approximately 1.8 to 2 million illegal migrants, a figure that starkly contrasts with official estimates and suggests a systemic failure in maintaining national sovereignty. The authors argue that when a government fails to enforce its borders, it undermines the foundation of statehood.
Restore Britain’s blueprint directly challenges the liberal narrative that views border control as inhumane. Instead, it frames mass deportation as a fundamental obligation of any government that respects its citizens and its sovereignty. The movement does not shy away from the complexities of this undertaking. It proposes an overhaul of existing laws that currently manage immigration, such as the Immigration and Asylum Act and the much-criticized Equality Act 2010, which is described as an impediment due to its ambiguous discrimination clauses.
A hallmark of Restore Britain’s strategy is its call to exit the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), arguing that its expansive interpretations often obstruct necessary deportations. The paper proposes the Great Clarification Act, which would allow Parliament to override judicial decisions in crucial national matters. This shift is positioned as a corrective against what the authors see as an erosion of parliamentary sovereignty over time.
In practical terms, the policy emphasizes an effective enforcement strategy. The initiative aims to establish a “hostile environment,” targeting illegal residents by mandating e-visas, conducting stringent Right-to-Work and Right-to-Rent checks, and closing loopholes in public services that inadvertently support illegal residency.
Additionally, the authors promote voluntary return incentives, drawing from successful models in the United States. They forecast that these voluntary departures—up to three times the number of forced removals—could lead to a significant reduction in the illegal population swiftly.
For those who refuse to leave, the plan calls for expanded Immigration Enforcement teams, increased detention facilities, and a range of transportation methods for deportation, including charter and military flights. The authors also emphasize the need for repercussions against countries that decline to accept their nationals back, showcasing a multifaceted approach to enforcement.
Even though the costs of implementing this policy may be considerable initially, Restore Britain views these expenses as an investment. The projected long-term savings in welfare and public resources are anticipated to outweigh initial expenditures, ultimately benefiting British taxpayers.
Public support for these measures appears robust. Polling data indicates widespread backing for the deportation of illegal migrants across various regions, including London. The sentiments reflect discontent with a political class perceived as out of sync with the public’s concerns on immigration.
Overall, "Mass Deportations" serves not only as an immigration policy but as a broader manifesto advocating for national renewal. It challenges the prevailing liberal ideals and aims to restore a sense of British continuity and self-determination. The assertion of national integrity stands as a cornerstone of this proposed future, offering a vision in stark contrast to the status quo. With Restore Britain, a movement driven by a patriotic narrative, advocates seek to reassert control and define a path forward for the nation.
"*" indicates required fields
