In a bold statement on X, Rupert Lowe, a British landowner and political figure, is making waves with his ambitious plan for a “deportations NATO.” His proposal aligns with his firm stance on immigration and aims to swiftly remove illegal migrants from the United Kingdom. Lowe’s efforts come as he faces significant backlash from critics who argue his policies are morally questionable. Yet, he remains undeterred, ready to defend his position against attacks from both left and centrist opponents.
Lowe’s argument is clear and uncompromising. He declares, “Illegal migrants. Gone. All of them. Without apology.” This direct language sets the tone for his vision, which is outlined comprehensively in a 100-page policy document. Asserting that his immigration plan is unprecedented in its detail, he refers to it as “deportation poetry,” a phrase that captures the stark intensity of his message.
The centerpiece of Lowe’s plan prioritizes illegal entrants with criminal records. He notes, “The sex pests will be removed,” emphasizing immediate action against those he views as threats to society. This approach resonates with public sentiments regarding safety and security. By promising to close hotels housing illegal migrants and to initiate deportation flights, he positions himself as a decisive leader, prepared to take tough measures.
Lowe’s stance extends beyond illegal immigration. He calls for significant reductions in legal immigration, stating that “far more people will leave than enter.” This includes shutting down visa routes from countries he associates with crime and social issues. He does not shy away from naming countries like Albania and Somalia, making it clear that his policy will involve discrimination based on historical facts surrounding immigration. Referring to English language proficiency, he argues, “If a foreign national is entirely unable to speak English, then they will be asked to leave.” This, he asserts, is vital for ensuring immigrants can contribute positively to society.
Lowe’s comments about social services reveal a more comprehensive aim; he believes that the housing crisis in Britain could be alleviated by prioritizing housing for British families over foreign nationals. His assertion, “A foreigner claiming benefits and living in social housing… they will be asked to leave,” reflects a perspective that prioritizes citizen needs over those of non-citizens.
Moreover, Lowe firmly opposes the presence of criminals within the borders, stating, “Foreign criminals gone, day one.” His commitment to national security is evident in his approach to dealing with extremists. He plans to strip citizenship from dual nationals engaged in extremist activities, emphasizing a zero-tolerance policy.
A particularly striking element of Lowe’s proposal is the notion of a “deportation NATO.” This ambitious idea would involve leveraging diplomatic and economic pressures against countries that refuse to accept deported citizens. Lowe suggests that relationships with nations, potentially including cooperation with the U.S., could be utilized to enforce this policy, a tactic that underscores his aggressive strategy.
At the same time, Lowe proposes to welcome “ultra high-skilled migrants” under strict conditions that prioritize benefits to the British people. By contrasting the high-quality individuals he seeks to attract with the current numbers, he paints a picture of a selective immigration process aimed at enhancing the nation’s prosperity.
Concluding his post, Lowe reinforces that every decision made under the proposed policies will be to benefit the British people, saying, “In combination with the vast numbers of unproductive migrants being ejected, there will be one winner. The British people.” This statement encapsulates his perspective that the national interest is paramount in his approach.
Lowe’s message is straightforward. He calls upon supporters of his vision to join “Restore Britain,” cementing his message within a framework of collective responsibility for national identity and integrity. His unwavering commitment to his immigration policies and clear intent to reshape the narrative around it signals a significant moment in Britain’s political landscape.
"*" indicates required fields
