Senator Richard Blumenthal recently made headlines with his assertion that non-citizen voting is “rare to the point of nonexistence.” This claim, made during an appearance on MSNOW, compares non-citizen voting to being “struck by lightning.” Such a statement not only seems to downplay serious concerns regarding election integrity, but it also contradicts data suggesting otherwise.
In defending the Democratic stance against election integrity measures, particularly provisions in the SAVE America Act that would require proof of citizenship to vote, Blumenthal dismissed the issue of non-citizen voting. However, available research tells a different story. An analysis by Just Facts, referenced by the Cato Institute, estimates that between 10% and 27% of non-citizen adults in the United States are illegally registered to vote. Given that there are over 19 million adult non-citizens in the U.S., this could result in approximately 2 million to 5 million illegal registrations. Those numbers are substantial enough to sway major elections, possibly impacting congressional races and presidential contests.
This isn’t a new issue. A study published in the peer-reviewed journal Electoral Studies back in 2014 offered similar insights. Researchers estimated that about a quarter of non-citizens were registered to vote, with 6.4% of them indicating they had actually voted. The study found that an overwhelming majority, 81.8%, of those who voted backed Barack Obama. The findings led the authors to conclude that illegal non-citizen votes likely influenced critical election outcomes, including results in the Electoral College and a significant Senate race that facilitated the passage of Obamacare.
The methodology behind the 2014 study combined self-reported data with verified voter registration records, resulting in a best estimate that 25.1% of non-citizens were unlawfully registered. This aligns closely with more recent analyses, reinforcing the notion that non-citizen voting is neither rare nor nonexistent.
Blumenthal’s metaphor falls apart under scrutiny. His dismissal of the issue reflects a larger trend among Democrats to minimize concerns surrounding election integrity while opposing measures intended to bolster it. The SAVE America Act aims to ensure that only U.S. citizens participate in federal elections—a principle that many view as essential to the integrity of the democratic process.
The implication of Blumenthal’s argument rests on the belief that the problem does not exist. With millions of potential illegal registrations at stake, such a position becomes increasingly difficult to uphold. At its core, this debate demands a commitment to honesty. If Democrats sincerely believe that non-citizen voting is not a problem, they ought to support verification measures that could help confirm that belief. Instead, the continued opposition to such measures raises questions about the willingness to address potential issues within the electoral system.
In summary, the conversation around non-citizen voting reveals much about the current political landscape. Statements like those made by Blumenthal may be aimed at easing concerns, but the data indicates a much more complex reality. A responsible approach to this issue involves not just open discourse but also a commitment to transparency and integrity in the electoral process.
"*" indicates required fields
