Experts are sounding the alarm about a “dominant” ideology they claim is driving a rise in domestic terrorism in the U.S. They’re urging President Donald Trump to issue a new executive order targeting this movement, often described as rooted in socialism. A report from the Legal Insurrection Foundation and the Defense of Freedom Institute for Policy Studies highlights how diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices morph under the guise of “intersectionality,” an ideology first outlined by Kimberlé Crenshaw in the late 1980s.
The report argues that intersectionality gives rise to divisive and discriminatory practices that elevate certain groups over others based on their perceived victimhood. According to the findings, intersectionality has led to campuses teaching students to view American society not as a landscape of opportunity but as an oppressive force globally.
This is not just a theoretical concern. The authors emphasize that without action, “the future of our education system and the safety of our nation depend upon” confronting this ideology directly. William Jacobson, founder of the Legal Insurrection Foundation, points out that while Trump’s previous executive orders against DEI policies are commendable, the deeper ideological roots of intersectionality persist in educational institutions.
The claim that intersectionality is “inherently socialist and collectivist” signifies a fundamental challenge to American values. The report asserts that these ideologies seep through more than 700 educational institutions across the country, from colleges to K-12 schools, often unchallenged. Jacobson elaborates, stating that this movement is “the mother’s milk of critical race theory,” suggesting that it is intrinsically linked to increasingly violent extremist groups.
The report connects the dots between intersectional ideologies taught on campuses and real-world violence by noting incidents involving groups like the Turtle Island Liberation Front, which planned attacks targeting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Their agenda, rooted in calls for decolonization, resonates with intersectionality’s core messages, creating a direct pipeline from classroom theories to potential domestic terrorism.
Jacobson and his co-authors are not asking to ban the theory entirely; rather, they want to ensure that federal funds do not support what they describe as unlawful discrimination under the banner of intersectionality. The emphasis here is clear: while individuals may hold intersectional views, taxpayer dollars should not back them.
He called for a comprehensive approach that includes updating executive orders to define intersectionality under the definitions of DEI and ensuring that educational institutions adhere to traditional American values. Jacobson believes that exposing and analyzing these ideologies through congressional hearings could yield significant insights and effective solutions.
The report articulates a broad strategy to combat the ideological infiltration in schools, advising various tactics such as legal action against institutions that promote intersectionality and urging a shift towards civics education grounded in American ideals. Jacobson underlines the dominance of these racial ideologies, stressing that for many students, alternative views are increasingly rare on campuses.
In summary, the report serves as a clarion call for a focused response at both the executive and legislative levels. The expectation is for a robust confrontation of ideology altering the landscape of American education, aiming for a return to the foundational values that have historically defined the nation.
"*" indicates required fields
