Iran’s ruling clerics view themselves as the earthly deputies of Muhammad al-Mahdi, the prophesied messianic figure in Shia belief. This connection shapes their actions and justifies their expansionist agenda, aiming to establish an Islamic state that they believe is essential for the Mahdi’s return. The regime sees political power not merely as governance but as a divine obligation tied to triggering an apocalyptic event.
Western observers often miss the complexities of Iran’s theocracy, oversimplifying it through the lens of the Shia-Sunni divide. The reality is far more convoluted and dangerous. The Islamic Republic does not adhere to mainstream Twelver Shia Islam—the faith observed by the majority of Shia Muslims around the world. Instead, it has warped the traditional beliefs into a radical ideology that mainstream clerics reject. This transformation centers around Mahdism, which they have distorted into a political doctrine filled with eschatological fervor.
Historically, Shia Muslims awaited the return of the Twelfth Imam with passivity, believing any governance during his occultation was illegitimate. But in 1979, Ruhollah Khomeini led a revolution that not only overthrew the Shah but also fundamentally challenged traditional Shia doctrine. He proposed the concept of velayat-e faqih, dictating that Shia Muslims must proactively prepare for the Imam’s return by establishing an Islamic state under clerical authority. This doctrine was enshrined in Iran’s constitution, framing Khomeini’s revolution as the first step toward fulfilling this divine mandate.
Khomeini’s views were not universally accepted among Shia clerics. Notably, Ayatollah Mohammad Kazem Shariatmadari criticized this unorthodox approach as unjust. Vali Nasr, a notable scholar, suggested that Khomeini’s leadership stemmed not from traditional Shia teachings but from a mix of mysticism and political thought, marking the beginning of a “new Shiism.” Khomeini’s ideas incorporated aspects of Neo-Platonism, positing the ideal leader as a “perfect man” with divine essence. His claims of achieving mystical union with God drew sharp rebuke, highlighting a dangerous elevation of personal authority over established theological boundaries.
Khomeini’s radical approach culminated in asserting that the Islamic state could override divine ordinances, elevating state authority above religious duties—a move unprecedented in Islamic jurisprudence. The impact of this doctrine extended to Ali Khamenei, Khomeini’s successor. Khamenei, who ascended as a middle-ranking cleric, utilized state mechanisms to legitimize his authority, evolving from lacking recognition to positioning himself as a grand ayatollah. His interpretation of Mahdism added five stages to the sequence leading to the Imam’s return, suggesting that the regime perceives itself as divinely mandated to remove obstacles such as the United States and Israel.
The regime’s perception of adversaries is framed as part of a religious duty. Khamenei views the challenges posed by the U.S. and Israel as facets of an eschatological struggle, positioning the Islamic Republic as an agent of divine prophecy. The election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2005 further intensified this belief, with Ahmadinejad framing Iran’s purpose as turning the nation into the home of the Hidden Imam, directing substantial state resources toward enhancing this vision, including the Jamkaran Mosque.
Under Ahmadinejad, the regime’s ideological network expanded, promoting a cult of Mahdism that resonated deeply with the populace. This radicalization crystallized through the Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), established as an ideological army devoted to extending the sovereignty of God’s law. The IRGC’s purpose extends beyond conventional military duties to support the regime’s claims of divine authority.
Increasing ideological indoctrination within the IRGC has spurred radical elements, as demonstrated during the Syria conflict and in repressive actions against civilian protesters. The IRGC’s worldview starkly divides the world into believers and non-believers, considering the destruction of Israel a crucial religious obligation. Their ideology ties the removal of Israel to the return of the Mahdi, blurring the lines between political and spiritual objectives.
A looming question remains about the future leadership of this religious empire. Mojtaba Khamenei, son of the late Supreme Leader, is positioned within a framework of contested legitimacy. Accusations of his ascension being orchestrated rather than earned cast doubt on whether he can assert authority as his father did. Reports about his health and visibility after a recent strike that killed Ali Khamenei invite skepticism about his capacity to fulfill the ambitions set forth by his father.
Mojtaba’s connection to apocalyptic ideologies suggests continuity in the regime’s radical trajectory. However, lingering uncertainties about his leadership capabilities may pose challenges. The IRGC’s commitment to its radical beliefs indicates that regardless of leadership changes, the ambitions of the Islamic Republic will focus on fulfilling prophecies, even at a tremendous human cost.
"*" indicates required fields
