Democratic candidate Paige Cognetti is under the microscope as she aims to flip a pivotal House seat in a battleground district. The current mayor of Scranton has drawn attention for her recent critiques of President Biden’s border policies, calling them “a huge misstep” and “really terrible” in a March podcast. This shift stands out, especially since Cognetti, who has been in office since 2020, did not publicly challenge Biden’s handling of the southern border during his presidency.
Cognetti is challenging freshman Rep. Rob Bresnahan in what is expected to be a highly competitive race in Northeastern Pennsylvania. This district could prove crucial for Democrats seeking to regain control of the House. As the 2024 elections approach, the way candidates navigate border security has become a hot-button issue, with many Democrats re-evaluating their stances.
Strikingly, while Cognetti expressed concerns about border control in a September 2021 interview, she refrained from holding the Biden administration accountable for the situation then. Fast forward to August 2023, and she co-signed a letter with several other mayors praising Biden’s strategies tied to border security and pathways to citizenship. They acknowledged Biden’s attempt to bring order to the border, contrasting sharply with her recent criticisms.
Cognetti’s spokesperson insists that the mayor has consistently called for stronger border security throughout Biden’s presidency, highlighting how the rampant issue of fentanyl has impacted her community. As the spokesperson stated, “She has said that President Biden didn’t do enough to secure the southern border.” However, questions arise regarding her previous support for lenient immigration policies, where she argued that immigrants contribute to cultural and economic growth, a stance she maintained during Biden’s time in office.
Advocating for more lenient immigration measures, Cognetti has previously pushed for legal protections for several Central American nationals living in the U.S. In a July 2021 statement, she emphasized the potential national security risks of not providing pathways to citizenship for illegal immigrants, saying, “If we don’t do this now, we will start to erode in our strength.” This echoes her earlier calls for mass amnesty, signaling a significant shift in tone as she attempts to align with the current political climate.
Her opponent, Bresnahan, has seized on this inconsistency. He argues that Cognetti’s policies would endanger the district and accused her administration of contributing to rising crime in Scranton. He points out, “Mayor Paige Cognetti’s soft-on-crime policies have already led to a spike in violence in Scranton.” This response underscores the tension surrounding public safety, particularly in districts where crime is a primary concern for voters.
In defense of her record, Cognetti’s team argues that she has invested in law enforcement and has led initiatives resulting in a decrease in violent crime. Still, the controversy surrounding immigration policies and public safety will likely dominate discussions as the election approaches.
The political landscape in Northeastern Pennsylvania remains fragile. The Cook Political Report labels the contest as “Lean Republican,” adding pressure on Cognetti’s campaign to solidify her stance and counteract criticisms from Bresnahan and others. As candidates maneuver through the complexities of border policy and public safety, the upcoming election promises to be a revealing test of voter sentiment in the region.
"*" indicates required fields
