Utah Governor Spencer Cox has ordered an independent investigation into Justice Diana Hagen of the state Supreme Court amid allegations of an unethical relationship with attorney David Reymann. These allegations surfaced from Hagen’s ex-husband, who claimed she sent “inappropriate” text messages to Reymann. This attorney participated in challenging a Republican-friendly redistricting map that helped maintain four congressional seats in Utah. Tensions ran high following Hagen’s role in a unanimous decision to reject a GOP redistricting plan in July 2024, a ruling that resulted in one of those seats flipping to blue in the upcoming 2026 elections.
The allegations raised serious concerns about Hagen’s impartiality. Hagen, appointed by Cox, finds herself under the microscope after her ex-husband filed a complaint that led to investigations by the Judicial Conduct Commission. Local media outlet KSL reported that the commission—an independent body comprising lawmakers, judges, and public members—decided not to pursue the matter further after their initial investigation. However, the decision has not quelled doubts regarding the integrity of the state’s judiciary, particularly in light of a key redistricting decision.
Hagen and Reymann have both denied the allegations, with Hagen stressing her commitment to ethical conduct in her public statement. “My last involvement in the redistricting case was October 2024,” she asserted. “I voluntarily recused myself from all cases involving Mr. Reymann in May 2025.” She emphasized that her proactive measures were designed to ensure transparency and integrity in her judicial responsibilities. “I took prompt, prudent, and transparent steps in response to the allegations made by my ex-husband,” she added, stating her full cooperation with the commission’s review.
Notably, the timeline presented by the complaint and subsequent interviews revealed that Hagen and her husband began discussing divorce in September 2024. Their interactions with Reymann occurred shortly before this decision, which raises questions about the nature of the relationships involved. Furthermore, Hagen did not meet Reymann one-on-one until 2025, which her defense indicates reflects a lack of any untoward conduct during the redistricting decision-making process.
Governor Cox, along with Senate President Stuart Adams and House Speaker Mike Schultz, expressed a desire for deeper transparency. In their joint statement, they emphasized the need to restore public confidence in the judicial system. “Allegations of this nature, especially involving public officials, must be examined with transparency and accountability,” they stated, highlighting the importance of trust in the state’s highest court amidst politically charged decisions.
The unfolding of these events presents a larger narrative around judicial ethics and public trust. As the investigation progresses, the balance between maintaining integrity within the judiciary and managing political ramifications will undoubtedly be scrutinized. Questions remain regarding how these allegations might influence public perception of the court’s decisions, particularly in upcoming elections.
This investigation will continue to attract attention as more details emerge, shaping not only the future of Justice Hagen’s career but also the broader political landscape in Utah as it navigates a pivotal redistricting cycle. How the state addresses these concerns could set a precedent for maintaining transparency and ethical accountability among its public officials.
"*" indicates required fields
