Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger recently signed a series of gun-control measures likely to provoke intense debate. These changes focus primarily on a proposed ban on assault firearms, which has already sparked backlash among Republican lawmakers. The amendments to House Bill 217/Senate Bill 749, particularly the removal of the word “fixed,” create broad implications for the definition of assault firearms. This ambiguity could potentially classify a wide array of commonly used semi-automatic rifles and pistols under the new ban.
House of Delegates Minority Leader Terry Kilgore criticized Spanberger’s actions, stating, “If there was any doubt that Gov. Spanberger was coming for our firearms, this substitute removes it.” Kilgore expressed concerns that the amendments not only reinforce existing restrictions but expand them to include firearms that can accommodate magazines holding more than 15 rounds. He emphasized that this would affect “the vast majority of firearms in Virginia that are in common use for legal purposes.”
The U.S. Department of Justice has also weighed in, indicating potential constitutional concerns surrounding the measures. In a letter addressed to Virginia’s Democratic Attorney General, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon warned of litigation should the state enforce laws that infringe on the individual right to bear arms. Dhillon’s letter underscored that such legislation could require law enforcement to unconstitutionally restrict the ownership and sale of popular firearms like the AR-15. She affirmed that “the Second Amendment protects the rights of law-abiding citizens to own and use AR-15 style semiautomatic rifles for lawful purposes.”
In the face of opposition, Spanberger has framed her push for these laws as a necessary step toward improving public safety. “I grew up in a family where responsible gun ownership was expected, and I carried a firearm every day as a former federal agent,” she stated. Emphasizing a balance between Second Amendment rights and the need to address gun violence, she remarked, “Gun violence is the leading cause of death for children and teenagers in America.” Her statement indicates a concern about safety that she believes justifies her legislative actions.
Spanberger’s amendments propose a ban on the future sale, transfer, manufacture, and importation of firearms classified under this new framework while allowing exemption for legally owned firearms before a specific date. This legislation introduces a Class 1 misdemeanor for violations and imposes limitations on how grandfathered firearms can later be transferred or sold. It now returns to the General Assembly, where lawmakers must consider her proposed changes.
In addition to the contentious assault firearms bill, Spanberger enacted several related measures, including House Bill 21, requiring firearm manufacturers and dealers to implement controls to prevent illegal sales. This law permits civil action against the firearm industry if their actions contribute to public harm. Furthermore, she signed House Bill 110, which prohibits leaving firearms in plain view inside unattended vehicles, and House Bill 40, aimed at banning the manufacture and distribution of unserialized “ghost guns.”
Critics, including Dhillon, highlight the significant volume of legislation moving through the General Assembly that appears to threaten Second Amendment rights. In her concluding remarks, she emphasized a commitment to uphold the rights of law-abiding Virginians: “The Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens shall not be infringed.” This continues the ongoing dialogue about the tension between gun rights and public safety, ensuring that the upcoming legislative decisions in Virginia will remain in the national spotlight.
"*" indicates required fields
