New Jersey resident Yehuda Miller, along with Phani Mantravadi of Check My Vote and Patty McMurray from The Gateway Pundit, is spearheading a monumental effort to investigate the integrity of the 2020 election in Michigan. Over 100 volunteers have come together to comb through nearly one million documents related to the November 2020 election in Detroit and Wayne County. Their investigation has hit a significant milestone thanks to a court ruling compelling the City of Detroit to produce records that officials initially denied releasing in response to Miller’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
The task at hand is demanding and painstaking, with many documents arriving disorganized. The team, leveraging Mantravadi’s technical skills, has created a custom website to systematically organize over 155,000 absentee ballot envelopes for review. This meticulously structured approach allows volunteers to scrutinize each envelope for potential irregularities and signs of fraud. Volunteers are dedicating extensive hours to this cause, demonstrating an admirable commitment to election integrity as the upcoming midterm elections approach.
Their findings are indeed alarming. A preliminary analysis reveals that 12.4% of absentee ballots cast from several taxpayer-subsidized housing units in Detroit lack the accompanying envelopes required by Michigan law. The envelopes not only serve a logistical purpose but also act as a security measure to ensure that votes are legitimate. Michigan law mandates that all absentee ballots be returned in an official envelope that bears the voter’s signature. Without this, ballots should not be counted.
“Clerks are legally obligated to enforce it,” the investigation stresses, referring to the legal weight of proper envelope processing. To sidestep this requirement constitutes a serious violation classified as a felony under Michigan Election Law, underscoring the gravity of their findings.
Critical questions arise from this discrepancy. Why did these ballots get counted without the legally required envelopes? The investigation aims to hold relevant officials accountable. The role of Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey, in particular, is under scrutiny, considering the potential mishandling of absentee ballots in the city.
Past actions by state officials also ignite concern. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson faced judicial rebukes for sending unsolicited voter applications to millions without consent and restricting signature verification protocols during the high-stakes mail-in voting process. Such decisions have raised red flags about the foundational integrity of the electoral process in the state.
The current investigative team is not relying on external help, instead choosing to keep their work independent to avoid any potential bias or manipulation of evidence. This commitment demonstrates a fierce determination to uncover the truth behind significant electoral discrepancies.
As the investigation continues, the team intends to reveal even more alarming findings related to the ballot envelopes, pointing to potential widespread misconduct. The work is costly, and the team is seeking public support to continue their investigation, which has already incurred substantial expenses in document retrieval and review processes.
Recent examples showcased in their findings illustrate the serious nature of the inconsistencies they are uncovering. Instances include ballots from fictitious addresses that made their way through the system and envelopes lacking proper signatures yet still being counted. In one case, a ballot from an overseas address was received on election day, contrary to expectations about mailing times, raising further doubts about electoral processes.
These findings not only question the validity of ballots but also highlight systemic issues within the election infrastructure. The ongoing scrutiny of these past elections demonstrates the challenges faced by election officials and the pressing need for transparency and accountability.
Moving forward, the dedicated effort by Miller and his team calls into question the reliability of the electoral process in Michigan, particularly the manner in which elections were conducted during a pivotal time. Their findings may play a crucial role in shaping future electoral integrity discussions, revealing the potential for larger patterns of irregularities that could affect elections beyond 2020.
In summation, the investigation led by Miller and supported by a robust team of volunteers illustrates a concerted effort to uphold election integrity. As these findings emerge, they not only represent the hard work and dedication of those involved but also emphasize a crucial aspect of American democracy—ensuring that every vote cast is valid and meets the legal criteria established to protect the voting process. It remains to be seen how these revelations will influence future electoral practices and the officials responsible for overseeing them.
"*" indicates required fields
