Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s recent comments about Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) have generated significant attention. During a conversation with podcaster Adam Corolla, Kennedy suggested the idea of assigning an ICD code to TDS, addressing a joke about a hypothetical vaccine. While Kennedy’s remark might have been lighthearted, he stands firm in his belief that TDS is a real and pressing issue affecting many, including his own family.
Adding to the conversation, psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert claims that TDS afflicts a staggering 75% of his liberal patients in Manhattan. He describes this phenomenon as a “profound pathology,” asserting that it could be the defining issue of our time. “People are obsessed with Trump, they’re fixated, they’re hyper-fixated on Trump,” Alpert shared, highlighting the distress it causes—sleep disturbances, trauma, and restlessness among those affected.
However, analyzing TDS as merely a mental disorder overlooks a critical aspect: it resembles mass hysteria more than a simple psychological condition. This distinction is vital because addressing TDS at the individual level—whether through therapy or hypothetical vaccinations—fails to tackle the broader societal influences that perpetuate it.
Mass hysteria thrives on social contagion. Outside forces, like the media, energize and amplify the fears surrounding Trump, creating an environment where individuals feel justified in severing relationships over political beliefs. The fear surrounding Trump has grown so powerful that it can fracture familial bonds, turning political disagreements into moral ones.
The media plays a pivotal role in this dynamic. In late-night shows, talk programs like The View, and even sports commentary, the message is relentless: Trump is an omnipresent threat. This portrayal of Trump manifests as a modern-day bogeyman, replacing the fears of children with the anxieties of adults. The panic surrounding him resembles historical instances of mass hysteria, such as the Salem Witch Trials or the dancing sickness outbreaks of centuries past.
Yet, the tools of modernity, especially social media, have exacerbated these episodes. Algorithms feed content that heightens fear and division, leading to a societal contagion of hysteria that seems unprecedented in scale and reach. The suggestion that Trump represents an unequivocal danger to democracy perpetuates a narrative that feels insurmountable.
Understanding TDS in this light requires attention to the media and cultural structures that enable its spread. Solutions won’t arise from individual therapy sessions but rather from a collective response to the fear-mongering tactics employed by those looking to maintain power. The normalization of hostility toward Trump supporters, evident in articles and social media posts encouraging people to cut ties with family, reinforces this mass hysteria—coercing individuals into conformity under the guise of moral obligation.
In history, instances of mass hysteria have eventually subsided. TDS will too, but only if the media and political figures recognize the hysteria they contribute to and work to change the dialogue. If the roots of this fear can be addressed, the cycle of division and disruption may finally break. Until then, as history shows, the patterns of mass hysteria will continue to play out, with relationships burdened by perpetual discord over political differences.
"*" indicates required fields
