The recent resignation of Joe Thompson, a key federal prosecutor in Minnesota, marks a significant moment in the ongoing battle against corruption in the state. Thompson, who served as the acting U.S. Attorney for Minnesota after his appointment by President Donald Trump in May 2025, played a pivotal role in uncovering massive fraud linked to the Feeding Our Future program. This $250 million scandal has exposed serious issues within local governance and sparked widespread concern over fraud within Minnesota’s state systems.
In his resignation, Thompson emphasized the honor of representing the United States. “It has been an honor and a privilege to represent the United States and this office,” he stated in an email obtained by the Minnesota Star Tribune. However, he did not provide details about his reasons for stepping down or his future plans.
His departure comes on the heels of increasing scrutiny over the Justice Department’s handling of investigations, particularly the contentious case involving the shooting of Renee Good by a federal immigration agent. Thompson reportedly disagreed with the DOJ’s decision to exclude state officials from the investigation and the intent to probe Good’s widow. This discord highlights growing tensions within federal law enforcement regarding how cases intersect with state authorities.
Notably, Thompson’s efforts led to numerous indictments in the Feeding Our Future fraud case, which involved fraudulent claims made during the COVID-19 pandemic, predominantly affecting the Somali community in Minnesota. “Our state is far and away the leader in fraud now and everyone sees it,” he remarked to the Minnesota Star Tribune Editorial Board last year. His blunt assessment underscores the gravity of the situation and the challenges in combating fraud at this scale.
The fallout from Thompson’s resignation extends beyond his personal career. In recent days, four senior lawyers with the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division also resigned, questioning the integrity of the investigations being conducted. Their departure suggests a deeper crisis within the department, particularly in relation to high-profile cases like that of Good, where the DOJ opted to distance itself from any further inquiry involving civil rights implications.
Thompson’s involvement in other critical cases, such as the prosecution of Vance Boelter, further cements his legacy as a hard-hitting prosecutor. Boelter was charged in connection with a tragic shooting rampage that left two legislators dead and two others injured, showcasing the intense nature of crime that Thompson was tasked with tackling during his tenure.
The turning point of Thompson’s departure suggests a pivotal moment for federal law enforcement in Minnesota. With ongoing challenges in addressing corruption and maintaining confidence in public institutions, the state remains under a cloud of scrutiny as these cases unfold. As leaders reconsider their approach to governance and accountability, Thompson’s resignation may serve as a wake-up call to continue efforts against the fraud epidemic that has plagued the state’s reputation.
With these developments, the implications for Minnesota’s future governance and law enforcement seem profound. Thompson’s resignation shines a light on the complexities and challenges that remain within the system, as the battle against corruption and the quest for justice continues.
"*" indicates required fields
