Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey has reaffirmed his position against collaborating with federal immigration authorities, asserting a controversial stance following a tragic event. In a recent interview on “Fox & Friends,” Frey addressed the case of Victoria Eileen Harwell, a local woman killed in a DUI incident involving an illegal immigrant. His comments highlighted a growing tension between local governments and federal immigration enforcement.
Frey has been vocal about his opposition to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations within Minneapolis. During the interview, he stated, “We are willing to work with people when it’s about murder and when it’s about crime. But the truth is that this ain’t about that.” His words attempt to separate his approach to immigration from public safety concerns, downplaying the implications of his policies on criminal cases like Harwell’s.
The case drew significant attention when it was revealed that the perpetrator, Llangari Inga, an undocumented immigrant from Ecuador, was not detained by local authorities despite ICE’s requests. Inga was first arrested in connection with Harwell’s death but was released without notification to federal authorities—an occurrence that reflects the ongoing friction between sanctuary city policies and federal immigration enforcement. This incident was not isolated; over the past few years, nearly 470 illegal immigrants with criminal backgrounds have been released back into Minnesota communities under Frey’s administration, raising questions about the safety of residents.
Frey defended his position by emphasizing a distinction between serious criminal offenders and the larger immigrant population. He claimed, “A lot of the people that ICE is picking up right now in our city are not a problem for Minneapolis.” This assertion reveals a core belief among some leaders in sanctuary cities: that the majority of undocumented immigrants contribute positively to their communities, often starting businesses and integrating into local life. Frey continued, “What I’m saying is that a lot of the people that ICE is picking up right now in our city are not a problem for Minneapolis,” signaling his commitment to protecting immigrants who have lived in the city long-term.
Tricia McLaughlin, the Department of Homeland Security’s assistant secretary for public affairs, disagrees with Frey’s assessment. She asserted that mayors prioritizing “sanctuary” policies are effectively protecting individuals who pose a danger, a claim that casts doubt on the rationale of leaders like Frey. The contrasting views highlight a critical divide: one side sees the need for strict immigration enforcement for public safety, while the other believes that supporting immigrants fosters community prosperity.
Frey’s insistence on supporting the city’s immigrant community comes with consequences. His comments about chaos caused by federal immigration operations suggest that he believes ICE’s presence disrupts local safety rather than bolsters it. “What we’re seeing right now is the kind of chaos that is being caused by this massive influx of ICE agents isn’t helpful,” he remarked, underlining a perspective that federal enforcement exacerbates tensions and fear within those communities.
This ongoing debate raises essential questions about the balance between community safety and the rights of immigrants. While Frey’s compassionate stance aims to prioritize the immigrant population, critics warn that policies like his can place citizens in harm’s way. With voices from both sides of the issue increasingly vocal, the path forward remains uncertain, as local, state, and federal interests continue to clash over immigration policy in Minneapolis.
"*" indicates required fields
