CNN’s recent handling of inflation data under different presidential administrations has sparked significant backlash, particularly on social media. A comparison of two tweets—one highlighting inflation during Joe Biden’s presidency and the other during Donald Trump’s—reveals a stark contrast in the network’s tone and framing.
In March 2023, CNN tweeted about inflation under Biden, acknowledging that “US inflation is still high, but it’s falling,” with a specific reference to the Consumer Price Index that measured 6%. Fast forward to January 2026, and the narrative shifts dramatically. CNN reported that “US inflation remained at 2.7% in December, underscoring persistent cost of living challenges.” While both figures indicate inflation, the difference in CNN’s presentation is striking. Under Biden, 6% inflation carries a tone of cautious optimism, whereas 2.7% inflation under Trump communicates a sense of crisis.
Cabot Phillips from the Daily Wire brought attention to this disparity, posting an image of both tweets side by side on X. He pointed out that CNN’s framing shifts according to the current president rather than the economic indicators. In the online discourse that followed, many users echoed his sentiments. One user remarked, “For CNN, a 6% inflation rate under Biden was considered good, but a 2% inflation rate under Trump is considered bad.” This sentiment captures the frustration felt by many regarding perceived media bias.
The underlying message in the reactions from social media users is clear: people are growing weary of the seemingly inconsistent media coverage that appears to favor one political narrative over another. As one commentator noted, “Same outlet. Same CPI report. Completely different tone based on who’s in office.” This discontent reflects a broader mistrust in journalistic integrity, leading to calls for more accountability from mainstream media.
Even notable figures like Karoline Leavitt have voiced their dismay, labeling CNN as “fake news” in response to their reporting practices. Such statements indicate a growing sentiment among certain audiences that the media is not only biased but also detached from the reality of the information they present.
Overall, this episode underscores a critical issue faced by major news outlets: the challenge of maintaining credibility in an era when bias is increasingly scrutinized. The contrast in CNN’s treatment of inflation under different administrations serves as a case study in how media framing can influence public perception, further fueling skepticism toward the news.
"*" indicates required fields
