Last week, the Colorado appellate court took a closer look at the case of former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters. The hearing centered on numerous concerns raised about her original trial and subsequent sentencing. Senior Assistant Attorney General Lisa Michaels faced tough questioning from the judges about a critical component of Peters’ felony charges. Specifically, there was an absence of clearly defined “benefit” connected to one particular charge. This is important because, without this key element, the integrity of the charge stands on shaky ground.
Another significant issue arose regarding jury instructions. The judges picked apart the language used in these instructions, noting that while one charge was presented as a felony, its description misleadingly contained the word “might,” which only pertained to the lesser misdemeanor charge. Such ambiguity can confuse jury members and potentially skew their understanding of the case.
The judges did not stop there. They scrutinized sentencing remarks made by District Judge Matthew Barrett, who considered conduct that was never officially charged in Peters’ case. Specifically, they questioned whether references to alleged election fraud in Mesa County or elsewhere were even permissible. These questions raised serious doubts about the fairness of Peters’ trial and whether a mistrial could be warranted due to these legal missteps.
On top of these legal complexities, Peters now faces additional serious allegations following what her representatives stated was an assault by a fellow inmate. According to her official X account, she claims she was “assaulted by another inmate” while simply trying to fill a water unit at the La Vista Correctional Facility. Interestingly, while the incident was captured on camera, the crucial moments leading to the conflict were not recorded. As a result, Peters has reportedly been placed in solitary confinement and is facing charges of felony assault, a significant escalation from her previous non-violent convictions.
Peters, a 70-year-old Gold Star mom with no prior criminal history, found herself sentenced to an extraordinary nine years in a Colorado prison for non-violent offenses back in October 2024. Her attorney pointed out that Peters is currently in a medium-security facility surrounded by violent offenders, a situation stemming from the lack of minimum-security options available for women in Colorado. This raises further questions about her safety and the appropriateness of her confinement given her non-violent status.
As this story continues to develop, the legal ramifications for Peters look uncertain. The appellate court’s hearing highlighted vital deficiencies in the prosecution’s case, while the new assault allegations add another layer of complexity to an already complicated situation. The implications for Peters remain significant and will warrant close monitoring as more information becomes available.
"*" indicates required fields
