Björn Höcke, an influential member of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and chairman of its Thuringian branch, offers a stark critique of contemporary German politics. With a background as a history teacher, he is known for his sharp opposition to what he describes as a left-globalist political establishment. In a recent interview, Höcke presents a sweeping and uncompromising analysis of the struggles faced by Germany, arguing that the country is on a dangerous path dictated by elites increasingly disconnected from the populace.
Höcke’s core assertion is that Germany is experiencing the last gasps of a failing postwar order. “The fish stinks from the head down,” he says, capturing the essence of his critique: the ruling class’s inability to adapt or address the pressing issues facing citizens. This decay, he argues, stems from what he calls “negative selection,” leading to leaders who prioritize their survival over the public good. He likens the current political environment to an “ochlocracy,” where the true essence of democracy is smothered under the weight of elite conformity and control.
His comments on executive power dynamics are equally revealing. Höcke contends that the ruling politicians have created both internal and external enemies, labeling the AfD as a domestic threat while demonizing figures like Putin on the international stage. “It is ridiculous that the former US satellite EU and its globalist elites are now dabbling in independent foreign and military policy,” he asserts. He emphasizes that such a confrontational stance towards Russia leads to inevitable consequences for Germany, uprooting its political stability and economic interests.
The AfD’s growing popularity, especially in eastern Germany, suggests a shifting political landscape. Höcke highlights that many citizens begin to view the party as a legitimate voice for those sidelined by the current regime. “We are already consistently trailing the Union in federal polls and will take a solid lead in the coming years,” he confidently states, indicating the momentum the party is building against traditional political factions that he sees as ineffective.
Moreover, Höcke reflects on the unique political experiences of eastern Germans, whose historical context shapes their skepticism towards state control and media narratives. He suggests that this demographic’s memory of the GDR guides their perception of the modern political climate, making them less susceptible to mainstream propaganda. The contrast with western Germany remains clear, as residents grapple with a combination of prosperity and ideological re-education that has left them questioning their own national identity.
On the subject of political leadership, he envisions a future where the AfD, through its strength in Thuringia, becomes a model for changing the national narrative. His goals include a substantial focus on remigration, family policies, and dismantling the ideological bias in state institutions. Such an agenda, from his perspective, is vital for redefining the political framework in which German citizens engage with their governance.
The “firewall” established by mainstream parties against the AfD is, according to Höcke, a fundamental challenge to democratic principles, stifling meaningful political discourse. He observes that the treatment of AfD members in parliament resembles political harassment, suggesting a troubling erosion of democratic norms. “The government can become the opposition and the opposition can become the government if the people so desire,” he reiterates, stressing the need for genuine representation in political spaces.
Further emphasizing the plight of dissenting voices, Höcke acknowledges what he perceives as a dangerous decline in pluralism and the rise of cancel culture in Germany. He maintains that the current establishment’s hysterical reactions reveal their insecurities as they attempt to suppress dissent, laying bare a fear of loss of power. “However, the aggressiveness of the establishment also shows that we have struck a nerve with our political demands,” he reflects, indicating a conviction that the AfD resonates deeply with a growing segment of the population.
Höcke also addresses media dynamics, claiming that the German media landscape has lost its footing as an unbiased observer and has instead become a mouthpiece for the state. He argues that the mainstream press ignores its obligation to provide a critical check on power, further enabling a system he deems increasingly propagandistic. “When we come to power, we will terminate the state media contracts and support the development of a fresh, free media landscape,” he states with determination.
Finally, Höcke draws parallels between the AfD’s struggles and the MAGA movement in the United States, recognizing both as part of a broader conservative resurgence against globalist pressures. He appreciates the MAGA movement’s ability to mobilize citizens around issues of national sovereignty and identity, framing it as an inspirational force for the AfD’s fight against the perceived dissolution of cultural and political integrity in Germany. “MAGA is a role model because we are dealing here with a movement that is more than just a party,” he concludes, suggesting that the success of such movements is critical for the future of democracy both in Germany and overseas.
In unpacking Höcke’s perspectives, it’s evident that the political landscape in Germany is facing turbulent times, with rising tensions fueled by discontent toward established elites. His analysis reveals a belief in a turning tide, where a call for realignment and restoration of core democratic values could mark the beginning of a new chapter in German politics.
"*" indicates required fields
