Florida Governor Calls for Congressional Ban on Remittances to Somalia Amid Immigration Crackdown
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis is stepping up his efforts against illegal immigration by advocating for a congressional ban on financial remittances to Somalia. In recent comments, DeSantis claimed these money transfers contribute to domestic lawlessness and encourage further illegal immigration.
“Congress could stop the remittances to Somalia tomorrow,” he stated, highlighting the authority of legislators to impose restrictions on these transactions, particularly if they originate from fraudulent sources. His assertion garnered attention online, resonating with those who call for a nationwide ban to eliminate funding that supports illegal activities.
This recent initiative aligns with DeSantis’s broader push for stricter immigration regulations in Florida. He has criticized local legislative efforts for being inadequate, particularly regarding the lack of restrictions on undocumented immigrants sending money abroad. “A lot of these folks from third-world countries… then they send money in the form of remittances back to their home country,” he emphasized during a roundtable in Palm Beach, arguing that legal immigrants should be allowed to send money, while those without proper status should not.
DeSantis cites concrete numbers to bolster his case. According to World Bank estimates, Somalia received over $2 billion in remittances in 2023, primarily from the U.S. A 2022 Federal Reserve Bank report indicated that remittances accounted for about 30% of Somalia’s GDP. For years, organizations have promoted these transfers as lifelines for families in need. However, DeSantis believes that in the context of illegal immigration, they pose more drawbacks than benefits.
His call to action stems from increasing instances of fraud among Somali nationals in Florida, where criminal activities such as document falsification and identity theft for public benefits have been reported. Authorities reveal that profits from such actions are often sent back to Somalia through remittance services.
“We have individuals gaming the system, acquiring federal benefits through fraudulent means, and then turning around and sending that money out of the country,” explained a Florida law enforcement official familiar with recent investigations. Republican officials highlight numerous inquiries that indicate systemic abuse of these financial systems.
The situation has drawn renewed attention to Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), a Somali-born congresswoman, who faced criticism following a speech on January 27 where she expressed her commitment to “protect the interests of Somalia from inside the U.S. system.” DeSantis did not hold back, calling for Omar’s expulsion from Congress, even suggesting the revocation of her citizenship and deportation. “Expel from Congress, denaturalize, and deport,” he tweeted, reflecting heightened tension around issues of loyalty, immigration, and foreign influence in politics.
For DeSantis, this issue transcends identity politics; it touches on national security and responsible governance. “It’s unacceptable that someone can come into our country illegally or fraudulently, access benefits, and use our resources to send money to a failed state where that money might be supporting corrupt or even hostile elements,” he stated at a policy forum in Fort Myers earlier this month.
The governor has pushed for measures such as implementing E-Verify systems within money transfer businesses to ensure legal residency status prior to permitting overseas transactions. Earlier this year, he proposed that anyone wanting to send remittances must first affirm their citizenship, drawing comparisons to restrictions against convicted felons. “We don’t allow convicted felons to wire money for terrorism,” he pointed out. “Why would we allow illegal aliens to send billions abroad unchecked?”
His proposals include categorizing illegal entry into Florida as a state crime, denying bail to undocumented immigrants, and broadening definitions of criminal gang affiliations to expedite deportation processes. Notably, he has suggested mandatory participation in the federal 287(g) program, which allows local law enforcement to assist with immigration enforcement.
Despite this push, DeSantis has encountered resistance, including from members of his party. Prominent Republican lawmakers such as Senate President Ben Albritton and House Speaker Daniel Perez have expressed concerns over what they see as an overreach of executive power. “As the people’s elected representatives, the Legislature, not the Governor, will decide when and what legislation we consider,” they stated in a letter contesting his special legislative session focused on immigration enforcement.
Nonetheless, DeSantis received backing from key supporters. State Sen. Blaise Ingoglia praised the governor’s approach as “essential for national survival,” rallying fellow Republicans to endorse the comprehensive enforcement strategies. “We need to stand with DeSantis,” he affirmed. “The voters have spoken. Illegal immigration, and the money flowing out of this country because of it, must be stopped.”
The notion of banning or taxing remittances, especially in nations with high corruption or instability, is gaining traction among some conservatives. Proponents argue that such measures eliminate financial incentives for illegal migration and reduce the potential for criminal organizations utilizing U.S. funds abroad. In contrast, opponents warn that these actions could harm law-abiding immigrants and destabilize foreign economies, potentially leading to greater migration pressures.
Experts in economics acknowledge the complexities of the situation. “Halting all remittances to countries like Somalia might reduce some illicit flows in the short term,” stated Dr. Leo Martinez, a development economist at Florida Gulf Coast University. “However, this could exacerbate instability in already fragile regions, which might prompt more people to flee.”
DeSantis remains resolute in prioritizing the disruption of what he calls the “invasion at the border” over the potential risks of destabilizing foreign economies. He consistently links foreign remittance flows to a larger strategy aimed at promoting border security and deterring immigration. “Cutting off the tap—whether it’s public benefits or illegal remittance pipelines—is one of the strongest tools we have to discourage illegal immigration,” he stated at a law enforcement roundtable in Titusville.
Whether Congress will respond to his demands is still uncertain, as any legislation regarding remittances would require bipartisan support—a challenging endeavor in an election year. However, DeSantis’s initiatives are stirring discussion and thrusting the issue into national prominence.
“People are watching what we do in Florida,” he concluded. “If Washington won’t lead, we will.”
"*" indicates required fields
