Wayne Allyn Root’s analysis of the geopolitical landscape surrounding U.S. interest in Greenland is layered and provocative. He begins with a candid admission: like many Americans, he holds little knowledge about Greenland. However, he quickly pivots to the notion that President Trump’s strategic approach to the territory places him several steps ahead of typical political thinking, which he likens to “checkers.” This chess analogy sets the stage for a discussion that blends national security with economic considerations.
Root’s praise for Trump’s efforts reflects a belief that control over Greenland could translate into a strengthened military presence and resources. He notes, “At worst, America will gain new military bases to protect our flank from attack by Russia or China.” This assertion speaks to broader concerns about global security dynamics, especially with rising tensions involving major superpowers.
Despite his initial support for the Greenland strategy, Root outlines perceived drawbacks. He is skeptical about the prospect of Greenland becoming a new state for America, citing its dependency on government assistance as a major concern. This leads him to draw parallels with Puerto Rico, which he labels as “another Puerto Rico,” indicating reservations about the potential demographic and political implications of integrating such a territory into the U.S. He argues that the addition of leaders who are likely to support Democratic agendas through welfare dependency would change the U.S. Senate balance—a point he underscores with figures on welfare in different states.
Transitioning from Greenland, Root passionately advocates for Alberta as a prime candidate for statehood, elaborating on its conservative politics, economic vitality, and resource abundance. He paints a vivid picture of Alberta as “the polar opposite of Greenland,” emphasizing its pro-fossil fuel stance and low welfare dependency. “Calgary’s percentage of citizens on welfare is a very low 4.1%,” he states, reinforcing Alberta’s appeal as a land that aligns with certain American values.
Root’s enthusiasm escalates when discussing Alberta’s wealth in natural resources and its strategic geographical importance. He presents the vision of a pipeline linking Alberta directly with the U.S. market for oil and gas, arguing it would position America as the most oil-rich nation. The reference to natural resources frames Alberta not simply as a political acquisition, but as an economic boon, thereby tapping into American patriotic sentiment about self-reliance and prosperity.
The call to action intensifies as Root highlights Alberta’s current dissatisfaction with Canadian governance and the grassroots effort for independence. Picturing citizens standing in long lines through harsh winter to sign a petition for a referendum, he outlines a moment of fervor that he believes can be tapped into by American leadership. “They need 177,000 signatures, but the organizers say they will get over one million,” he claims, suggesting that the desire for autonomy is ripe for a prospect of American statehood.
In a zany yet fitting conclusion, Root humorously proposes an absurd trade-off involving California to make Alberta the 51st state. While this is framed humorously, it reflects a serious undercurrent regarding the political calculus of state representation. He suggests that the potential loss of California—and its associated Democratic votes—could be a worthwhile sacrifice for what he sees as gaining stronger Republican footholds in Congress and furthering national interests.
Ultimately, Root’s piece blends admiration for Trump’s approach with a visionary proposal for the future of North America. It encapsulates a call for pragmatism in geopolitics that resonates with those who value strong, resource-rich alliances and assertive strategies in the face of global challenges.
"*" indicates required fields
