A Nevada judge’s retirement announcement has raised eyebrows following serious allegations of misconduct. Washoe County Judge Bridget Robb, 63, declared on January 23, 2026, that she would step down from her judicial duties just days after a court issued a protective order against her for allegedly stalking attorney Kelci Binau for over a year. The timing of her decision is notable and suggests significant pressure stemming from the legal actions surrounding her behavior.
According to court documents, Robb’s purported stalking involved numerous encounters with Binau across various locations in Reno, indicating a pattern that could suggest hundreds of incidents. Binau claims that Robb’s conduct was “willful, repeated and patterned,” creating an atmosphere of fear and intimidation that forced Binau to seek law enforcement intervention. This raises critical questions about the conduct of an individual holding a position of power in the judiciary.
The protective order, which Binau requested after allegedly exhausting attempts to get Robb to cease the behavior, has led to a hearing scheduled for February 13. This hearing will determine whether the order needs to be extended. The legal process in this case underscores not only the seriousness of the allegations but also the potential impact on the integrity of the judicial system. Chief District Judge Egan Walker’s decision to temporarily remove Robb from all cases and committee assignments indicates an immediate response to maintain public trust in the court system.
In her statement regarding her retirement, Judge Robb cited the well-being of the court, her family, and the community as motivating factors for her departure. “After careful consideration, I have made the decision to retire from my position as a judge,” she said. The phrasing suggests an attempt to frame her retirement in terms of responsibility rather than as a consequence of alleged criminal behavior.
Although Robb was planning to run for re-election on the family court bench, her abrupt retirement raises concerns about the repercussions of her alleged actions. Details from the investigation reveal that local police observed Robb loitering near a fitness studio frequented by Binau. Detectives closely followed her actions, culminating in a traffic stop where Robb reportedly admitted to stalking Binau. Her defense, stating she was merely “collecting information” as part of a routine, adds a layer of complexity to the situation.
The investigation seems thorough; video evidence from Ring cameras has reportedly been included in the filings, though specifics about what the footage shows have not been disclosed. The admission of evidence introduces further weight to the allegations, indicating a potential pattern of behavior that may have serious implications for Robb’s reputation and professional legacy.
Judge Robb’s appointment to the Second Judicial District Court in 2006 by former Governor Kenny Guinn now stands in stark contrast to the serious claims levied against her. The implications of this case extend beyond personal accountability; they raise broader discussions about the expectations of individuals who hold titles of authority in the legal system. As the hearing approaches, the focus will undoubtedly shift toward not just the alleged actions of one judge, but the potential systemic issues that such behavior may expose within judicial ranks.
"*" indicates required fields
