Under the cover of transgender rights, a troubling situation has emerged in Massachusetts prisons. Many male inmates are being housed in women’s facilities, raising serious concerns regarding the safety of female prisoners. In a recent opinion piece, investigative reporter Forest Romm sheds light on this issue, detailing the alarming rise in sexual abuse allegations at MCI-Framingham, the state’s women’s prison.
According to Romm, the 2018 criminal justice reform bill has made it possible for male offenders to identify as women and be transferred to female prisons. This move has turned MCI-Framingham into what many female inmates describe as “a haven for sexual predators.” The voices of these women are notable—they have chosen to remain anonymous, fearing repercussions from both their fellow inmates and prison officials.
Romm highlights the cases of violent offenders who have taken advantage of this policy. One example is Kenneth Hunt, now known as “Katheena,” who was convicted of double homicide. Another is Charles Horton, or “Charlese,” who has a troubling history of kidnapping and assaulting a minor. The shift of these men into a women’s prison is alarming, especially given that many of the women in these facilities are survivors of sexual violence themselves.
The current policy allows for a shocking lack of scrutiny regarding who can identify as a woman in a correctional setting. Romm notes that nearly all female inmates retain their male genitalia. Many may begin hormone therapy, but they often discontinue it shortly after arriving. “Gatekeeping is almost non-existent,” she writes, pointing out that men can be placed in women’s facilities absent a clear diagnosis of gender dysphoria. This “self-identification” policy has been promoted by transgender activists and appears to have created a system open to exploitation.
Romm reveals that male inmates have discovered ways to enjoy added privileges by claiming discrimination. They are even provided special shower times when female inmates are locked in their cells. Some male prisoners, however, still opt to shower with the women, adding to the sense of fear and discomfort among the female population.
The situation is grave, as many women report harassment and abuse without faith in the system to support their claims. Romm states, “Most women I interviewed said prison officials routinely minimize sexual-assault allegations against trans-identified inmates, while female accusers are dismissed, discredited, or punished.” One particularly harrowing account involves a woman who was allegedly raped by a male prisoner. After reporting the incident, she found herself moved to restrictive housing, where she could only leave once daily to shower.
The process of transferring these male inmates back to men’s prisons is notably challenging. Once a judge confirms their placement in a women’s facility, their return is precarious, regardless of their behavior or conduct post-placement. As Romm highlights, no male prisoner has been removed from MCI-Framingham, despite allegations of disruptive or violent behavior.
The implications of such policies extend beyond Massachusetts. Romm emphasizes that similar practices are occurring across the country, with a significant percentage of these men serving time for sexual crimes. Furthermore, she notes that lawmakers in various states—particularly Democratic leaders—are resisting attempts to legislate against male inmates using transgender identity as a way to access women’s prisons.
Romm concludes her piece with a stark warning: those promoting this policy appear determined to overlook the infringement on women’s rights. This issue raises profound questions about the balance between inclusivity and the protection of vulnerable populations. As women’s voices are diminished in discussions about their safety, the conversation around reforming these policies is urgent and necessary.
"*" indicates required fields
