California’s community college system is under severe scrutiny for failing to uphold basic standards of verification and accountability. With an estimated one in three applicants—around 1.2 million individuals—believed to be fraudulent, the situation raises significant questions about the integrity of public education and the responsible use of taxpayer funds. These aren’t just numbers; they represent real people missing out on opportunities due to systemic failures.
The community college system in California, which serves more than two million legitimate students across 116 colleges, was designed to provide accessible education and workforce development. However, it has now become a magnet for fraud. Many of these so-called “students” are not pursuing education. Instead, they enroll in online classes from abroad, submit assignments generated by artificial intelligence, and secure financial aid benefits intended for genuine learners. This scenario paints a troubling picture of an institution that has allowed essential safeguards to fall by the wayside.
National scrutiny finally forced the California community college system to address these alarming issues. Following investigations by CalMatters, nine members of Congress reached out to the U.S. Department of Education and the Justice Department, urging a federal investigation into the state’s financial aid practices. Only then did the governing board of the college system decide to implement mandatory student identity verification—a basic requirement that should have been in place all along.
Despite the pressing need for reform, there was notable resistance to even minor measures. The board rejected a proposal to introduce a modest application fee of no more than $10, opting instead to explore alternatives, as if verifying identity was an inconvenience rather than a necessity. This indecision reflects a larger issue: a preference for maintaining the status quo over confronting the reality of fraud undermining the educational system.
The impact on actual students is profound. During public forums, testimonies revealed that students are competing for limited spots in their required courses against bots. One student shared the disheartening experience of having a fraudster take her place in a class that was crucial for her academic progress. This instance not only highlights the personal stakes involved but also demonstrates a broader systemic failure—every fraudulent application displaces a legitimate student, delaying their graduation and adding to the overall costs of an already strained system.
This crisis isn’t confined to community colleges. A similar pattern emerges across California’s public-benefits systems. Relaxed eligibility checks have led to staggering losses, evidenced by the $32.6 billion lost to unemployment fraud during the pandemic. The state has seen prison inmates collect over a billion dollars in fraudulent claims, alongside numerous fictitious disability claims, with audits revealing shocking statistics: 98% of flagged medical providers were found to be fake. Programs meant to assist those in need, like CalFresh, have also encountered severe issues, with error rates hitting above 13% and costing the state billions in improper payments.
The situation in San Diego alone, where nearly $35 million was siphoned through EBT card fraud, illustrates the scale of these vulnerabilities. In aggregate, organized theft rings have reportedly stolen more than $180 million statewide. Yet, when these scandals come to light, California’s political leaders often reframe the challenges of enforcement as issues of compassion and equity, casting accountability as exclusionary. This attitude fails to address the core problems and ultimately harms the very individuals these systems are designed to support.
Once boasting a $100 billion surplus, California now faces an $18 billion deficit. The debate over the necessity of verifying student identities reveals a troubling disconnect between fiscal responsibility and governance. If one in three applicants is fraudulent, the systemic issues extend far beyond mere funding concerns. The core of the problem lies in governance itself. Until California addresses these fundamental failures and re-establishes checks and balances in its education and welfare systems, every new dollar introduced—regardless of its origin—will likely follow a trajectory of inefficiency and mismanagement, mirroring the fate of past surpluses. This systemic reform is not just an opportunity; it’s a necessity for the prosperity and integrity of the state’s educational landscape.
"*" indicates required fields
