Michigan’s Voter Rolls Under Scrutiny Amid Claims of Fraud and Federal Inquiry
The situation in Michigan regarding voter rolls has grown contentious. Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson faces accusations amid a federal inquiry into the state’s practices. Critics argue that the administration has failed to keep the voter registration lists clean and transparent. This scrutiny comes at a crucial time, as allegations of voting activity by noncitizens and oversight failures have raised alarm among many, particularly conservatives and election integrity advocates.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) illuminated this issue when it sent a letter on July 21, 2024, requesting details on how the state identifies and removes individuals not eligible to vote. The DOJ’s inquiry aims to ensure compliance with critical federal laws, including the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). These laws explicitly require states to maintain accurate voter rolls.
A recent tweet accused Benson of “facilitating voter fraud,” claiming her office failed to act on removing ineligible voters. This adds to the mounting suspicions that Michigan’s election systems are at risk of manipulation. The profile of this problem has broadened, especially following developments in Macomb County, where 15 would-be jurors recused themselves due to citizenship issues. A public records cross-check by Macomb County Clerk Anthony Forlini revealed that three of these individuals had voted in previous elections, raising critical concerns regarding voter eligibility.
The Michigan Bureau of Elections conducted a review and found complexities in these cases. According to their findings, one individual was confirmed as a U.S. citizen, while another, a noncitizen, had last voted in 2018 but had since been removed from the rolls. The third individual, who participated in the 2024 election, is subject to further investigation, with developments likely directed to the Michigan Attorney General.
Forlini voiced skepticism about the state’s handling of such issues. He emphasized the need for public trust in elections, stating, “Safe and secure elections is our goal. Public trust must be restored in the system so that all citizens have confidence in our electoral process.” His call for enhanced data-sharing between state agencies aims to address concerns surrounding citizenship status and voter registration.
Benson has countered these accusations, cautioning that reckless allegations could disenfranchise eligible voters. “Our major concern in these findings is that at least one eligible Michigan voter may now be under criminal investigation for voting,” she noted, underscoring the real consequences of such claims.
Concerns remain that any instance of noncitizen voting can undermine the integrity of elections in a state as critical as Michigan. Despite officials asserting that the suspected ineligible voting rate stands at about 0.00028% among over 5.7 million ballots cast in the 2024 presidential election, these statistics do little to reassure critics invested in election integrity.
Expert opinions from election law analyst David Becker offer a cautious approach to using jury duty exemptions as indicators of voter fraud. Becker warned that relying on jury questionnaire data can generate numerous false positives. “Jury questionnaires are a really bad source of matching to voter files… you’re gonna get a lot of false positives,” he explained. This indicates that perceived voting irregularities could stem from other issues, such as individuals misrepresenting their jury status to avoid serving.
Adding to this backdrop are the ongoing legal challenges surrounding Michigan’s voter registration practices. A recent lawsuit filed by the Republican National Committee argued that Michigan’s rolls are inflated by too many registrants. However, a U.S. District Court ruling dismissed the case as implausible under the NVRA, reinforcing that federal law seeks a balance between maintaining election integrity and ensuring eligible voters’ rights are upheld.
Judge Jane Beckering, in her ruling, stated, “There is no content in Plaintiff’s Complaint that states a plausible claim under the NVRA.” The court criticized the RNC’s data, which it deemed to inaccurately conclude that the voter rolls were unlawfully maintained. Michigan’s Attorney General, Dana Nessel, labeled the lawsuit “baseless,” indicating that it serves more to sow public doubt than to address genuine concerns.
Despite this positive ruling for Benson’s office, the DOJ’s inquiry signifies that the intensity surrounding Michigan’s voter registration system is likely to persist. The Department seeks detailed accounts of how many ineligible voters were removed from the rolls in the years leading up to 2024 and the processes used by the state to verify citizenship during voter registration.
Angela Benander, a spokesperson for Benson’s office, asserted that the department adheres to federal law. “The Secretary, Department of State, and Bureau of Elections follow the law,” she emphasized, pointing out that many concerns raised by the DOJ have already faced scrutiny in courts.
The assertion of compliance, however, does little to quell criticism. Detractors frequently refer back to the anomalies emerging from Macomb County as a clear concern regarding the management of Michigan’s electoral systems. For many observers, the fact that even a single case of noncitizen voting could occur is alarming.
The implications of these events reach beyond Michigan’s borders, especially following a May 2024 ruling from the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The court upheld the state’s voter maintenance practices, finding that Michigan’s multi-layered approaches to managing its voter lists were “more than reasonable.” This decision lends credibility to the state’s defense, yet pressure from the public and political entities continues to mount.
As these questions unfold, Michigan must strike the right balance between preventing fraud and ensuring access for eligible voters. With the DOJ’s investigation ongoing, legal challenges from national organizations, and incidents like the one in Macomb County, the integrity of voter rolls will likely remain a focal point leading up to the 2024 elections. The ongoing concern for election integrity and public confidence suggests that these issues will not easily be resolved.
The actions of federal and state authorities may set precedents for voter roll management across the nation. For those engaged in this dialogue, any hint of noncitizen participation is viewed as one instance too many.
"*" indicates required fields
