Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass encountered a wave of hostility this week as she left a federal courthouse. Onlookers shouted obscenities directed at her, reflecting the frustration of wildfire victims in the Pacific Palisades who are still grappling with the aftermath of a catastrophic fire. The recovery process, already fraught with complications, has been hindered by state housing regulations that many residents see as counterproductive.
Footage of the scene showed protesters shouting, “F*** YOU, KAREN BASS” as she exited the courthouse. A viral post captured the essence of their anger, suggesting the crowd included those who had lost their homes and are still barred from rebuilding. This boiling frustration is tied directly to the impact of the 2025 Palisades Fire, which obliterated over 5,000 homes. Residents have faced significant roadblocks in their efforts to rebuild due to Senate Bill 9 (SB 9), a California housing law enacted in 2022. The law allows for increased housing density on land previously designated for single-family homes, overriding local zoning policies.
Earlier this year, Bass sought an exemption from SB 9 for Pacific Palisades. She argued that the law exacerbates the challenge of recovery from the fire by encouraging denser housing in an area already vulnerable to fires. Governor Gavin Newsom appears poised to grant this request, issuing an executive order to pause the law’s implementation during the recovery phase. However, critics raise concerns that the leadership’s response came too late, as residents have been left in limbo, unable to rebuild due to bureaucratic delays and permit stall-outs.
In her formal appeal to the state, Bass acknowledged that lawmakers likely did not anticipate SB 9’s ramifications for the Palisades community in the wake of the disaster. Nonetheless, many community members believe that action to alleviate these issues should have come much sooner. Nearly a year of delay has left displaced residents without hope of returning home.
A connection to former CNN anchor Don Lemon’s recent legal troubles adds an interesting backdrop to the situation. The mayor’s confrontation at the courthouse unfolded amidst a federal hearing linked to Lemon’s arrest during a protest at a church in Minnesota. While the legal case surrounding Lemon is significant, for the audience shouting at Bass, the pressing issue was far more personal: the ongoing recovery from the wildfire disaster and the perceived negligence of government authorities.
The tension surrounding SB 9 reflects a broader discontent with how Sacramento addresses housing issues, particularly in fire-prone areas like Pacific Palisades. Years of devastation from wildfires, alongside increased insurance costs, have led many Californians to view state mandates with skepticism. Locals worry that SB 9 could lead to dangerous overcrowding and amplify hazards in areas that have already faced severe environmental challenges.
In the wake of the 2025 fire, a pushback against SB 9 gained momentum. Local fire safety advocates argue that the blanket application of this housing law penalizes those who have already borne the brunt of natural disasters. Homeowner associations have expressed their concerns, highlighting the disregard for essential safety considerations in favor of quick housing solutions. As one member noted during a city council meeting, their opposition hinges not on the need for housing but on the need for responsible planning in high-risk areas.
Despite Bass’s request for targeted exemptions, the call for broader adjustments to the law persists. Activists argue that one-size-fits-all mandates ignore community-specific risks and undermine local governance. Meanwhile, progress toward recovery remains stagnant: as of March 2026, fewer than 9% of destroyed homes in the Palisades have been approved for reconstruction. Homeowners face additional bureaucratic hurdles, such as re-certifying land under new SB 9 designations, which triggers extensive environmental evaluations.
Concerns over public safety have been raised by firefighters as well. A memo from LAFD Battalion Chief Kenneth Cook revealed frustration with city hall for not heeding fire officials’ advice on appropriate rebuilding density. His communication underscored a growing unease among first responders regarding the challenges they face due to dense developments in high-risk areas.
As criticism of Mayor Bass escalates, her challenges are amplified by rising crime rates, budget shortfalls, and shifts in policing strategies. Emergency response times in the Palisades have increased by 26% since the fire, driven by road closures and ongoing construction. This mounting pressure manifests itself in public frustrations like the outburst at the courthouse.
Protests are more than mere expressions of anger; they reflect a deep dissatisfaction with government entities perceived to have lost touch with the needs of their constituents. “These people have been stuck in limbo for over a year,” one protester succinctly captured, questioning the leadership priorities when the mayor is present at a federal hearing but neglecting outcry from constituents facing homelessness.
As Governor Newsom plans to sign an executive order limiting SB 9 in areas affected by fire, the political implications of Bass’s leadership linger. For community members eagerly awaiting a return to normalcy, faith in government is dwindling. Each day brings renewed uncertainty as rebuilding continues to stall, leaving homeowners with a profound sense of abandonment.
"*" indicates required fields
