A recent wave of protests against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) involved a range of socialist and communist groups organized across the nation. Despite a call for a “National Shutdown” that sought to disrupt work, school, and commerce, the anticipated response was tepid at best.
Fox News Digital has been investigating the financial ties of these activists, tracing connections back to Neville Roy Singham, a tech entrepreneur known for his support of Marxist ideals. Singham, who resides in China, has been described as promoting narratives favorable to the Chinese Communist Party. His influence raises questions about the underlying motivations for the protests.
In Washington, D.C., activists gathered at a bustling intersection, demonstrating a carefully planned effort. At 3 p.m., as one organizer instructed the group, “Into the streets,” a small contingent from the Party for Socialism and Liberation unfurled bright yellow signs. This organization, recognized as a key player in previous anti-police and anti-ICE demonstrations, helped shape the narrative surrounding these protests.
Promotional materials circulated ahead of the demonstrations portrayed ICE as an entity that strikes terror into communities. Signage calling for an immediate cessation of ICE funding marked the atmosphere. One sign read, “STOP ICE TERROR NOW,” reflecting the broader anti-ICE sentiment that the organizers were attempting to amplify.
The coalition of groups involved showed a diverse alignment, from explicitly socialist organizations like the Revolutionary Communists of America and the Communist Party USA to more mainstream groups connected to the Democratic Party, such as Indivisible. This collaboration illustrates the complex interplay between grassroots activism and partisan politics, making it difficult to distinguish the motives of the participants.
Drawing on tactics often associated with insurgency movements, such protests aim to shape a narrative of governmental failure, potentially aligning with the interests of foreign rivals. This approach not only serves the objectives of the protesting groups but may also advance a broader political agenda.
While protesters sought to draw attention to their cause, the day concluded with many filtering away after participating in what can be described as a performance more than a serious disruption. Amidst the protest, ordinary exchanges occurred, as individuals contemplated where to go for drinks after the demonstration—a reminder that the fervor of activism often contrasts sharply with everyday life.
Overall, while the protests may have made for compelling visuals and headlines, the subdued response suggests that their impact may be limited. Organizations like the Party for Socialism and Liberation may continue to drive discussions, but the efficacy of their tactics in generating widespread momentum remains questionable.
"*" indicates required fields
