A federal judge in Texas has sparked a firestorm of criticism following his order to release a five-year-old boy and his father from detention. U.S. District Judge Fred Biery, appointed by former President Bill Clinton, is now facing calls for impeachment over what many view as an incoherent and unprofessional ruling. Critics highlight the bizarre language within his opinion, which included questionable phrases, an imaginary date, and pointed attacks on federal immigration authorities.
The controversy erupted from Judge Biery’s February 3, 2025 ruling, which demanded that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security release Liam Conejo Ramos and his father, Adrian Conejo Arias, from custody by the end of that week. The pair had been detained after an ICE operation in Columbia Heights, Minnesota, and transferred to a center in Dilley, Texas. Biery’s directive has become a focal point in discussions over immigration policy and judicial behavior.
Critics wasted no time in condemning the judge. In a polarizing tweet, they branded his ruling as “unhinged,” highlighting its use of a fictional “Feb. 31″ date and odd closing remarks—”with a judicial finger in the constitutional dike, It is so ORDERED.” This backlash included screenshots of the ruling and an image of the young boy, seen as evidence of Biery’s alleged lack of judicial decorum. Calls for mass impeachment of judges emerged from this reaction, demonstrating the growing discontent toward perceived judicial activism.
The issue is intensified by the backdrop of public outrage surrounding federal immigration policies. Liam and his father were arrested on January 20, with some local school officials claiming the child was used as bait to lure in the mother. The Department of Homeland Security dismissed those claims as “an abject lie,” saying Adrian Conejo Arias abandoned his son in a running vehicle during the arrest.
Judge Biery’s order sharply criticized the tactics employed by federal immigration enforcement, calling into question the legitimacy of the warrants used. He stated, “Administrative warrants issued by the executive branch to itself do not pass probable cause muster. That is called the fox guarding the henhouse.” His rhetoric draws parallels to historical grievances listed in the Declaration of Independence, likening the government’s actions to “Swarms of Officers” and advocating for a reassessment of how laws affect children. He even included biblical verses alongside a photo of Liam in a Spider-Man backpack and bunny hat, which many found excessive.
The judge argued that the case stems from poorly devised government policies striving for daily deportation quotas, even if those goals traumatize children. He referenced White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller’s reported target of 3,000 arrests per day for 2025 operations as emblematic of a troubling trend. Liam’s father had a pending asylum application after entering the U.S. in December 2024, which advocates assert should afford him protections under due process laws.
Biery’s ruling put an immediate halt to deportation proceedings and criticized ICE for relying on administrative warrants that lacked independent judicial review. He wrote, “The Constitution requires an independent judicial officer,” and further stated, “The rule of law be damned,” signaling his disapproval of executive branch enforcement tactics.
Support came from civil rights organizations and Democratic lawmakers who praised Biery’s intervention. Representatives Joaquin Castro and Jasmine Crockett visited the detention facility and reported distressing conditions. They described young Liam as appearing malnourished and in poor health after two weeks in detention, fueling outrage from various immigration advocacy and child welfare groups.
The Dilley facility houses over 1,100 detainees, including many children, and has come under fire for appalling conditions, such as unsanitary food and insufficient medical care. Reports suggest that children are frequently held beyond recommended limits, raising further alarm.
Jennifer Scarborough, representing the family, expressed relief at the judge’s ruling. “We are pleased that the family will now be able to focus on being together and finding some peace after this traumatic ordeal,” she stated, underscoring the human cost of such policies.
Nevertheless, criticisms of Judge Biery have been significant. Detractors argue that he blurred the lines between judicial responsibilities and political commentary, particularly with his inclusion of emotionally charged language and imagery in a legal ruling. The juxtaposition of biblical quotes—”Jesus said, ‘Let the little children come to me…’” and “Jesus wept”—was seen by many as a form of grandstanding, detracting from the judicial nature of the ruling.
Concerns about Biery’s impartiality were further heightened by his professional social media activity. A widely circulated screenshot from his LinkedIn account showed him endorsing a post critical of ICE enforcement, which, combined with the eccentricities of his ruling, has led many to call for an investigation into his conduct.
“This is a JUDGE?!” one critic exclaimed in a tweet, linking to Biery’s opinion and advocating for impeachment proceedings. This sentiment aligns with broader concerns raised by figures like Elon Musk and leaders from countries like El Salvador regarding the independence of the U.S. judiciary.
As of now, the Department of Justice has remained silent in response to the ruling, while DHS refuted allegations of misconduct by ICE officers, asserting that standard enforcement protocols were followed. This case brings to the forefront a debate about the limits of immigration enforcement and the constitutional validity of administrative warrants, especially when children are involved.
The clash over this ruling highlights the continued tension between immigration enforcement practices and judicial oversight. As discussions intensify over the appropriateness of judicial activism, this case will likely serve as a pivotal point in future evaluations of federal immigration protocols and the role of the judiciary in sensitive cases.
"*" indicates required fields
