Fraud Charges Against Georgia Lawmaker Highlight Breach of Trust
Georgia State Representative Dexter Sharper faces serious federal charges for allegedly fraudulently collecting $13,825 in pandemic unemployment benefits while simultaneously earning income from various sources, including his legislative salary. This case is another instance in a troubling pattern of misconduct among lawmakers. Prosecutors claim Sharper submitted 38 false claims between April 2020 and May 2021, asserting he was unemployed and actively seeking work. The reality, according to investigators, is far different.
Documents reveal Sharper insisted he had not worked since March 13, 2020, stating only his own party rental business as a source of income. However, investigators allege he operated that business throughout the benefit period, earning up to $2,231 per week. Additionally, he reportedly earned $275 weekly as a musician while taking home $325 weekly as an elected official.
This case is part of a broader federal initiative targeting unemployment fraud, led by the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force. Sharper’s arraignment adds him to an unwelcome list of Georgia lawmakers facing scrutiny for similar allegations of fraud during a crisis.
U.S. Attorney Theodore Hertzberg has labeled fraud by government officials as a severe violation of public trust. He remarked, “When government officials lie to take money, and do it while holding an elected office, it violates the trust of citizens and weakens faith in our elected government.”
Inspector General Anthony P. D’Esposito concurred, arguing that Sharper’s actions represented an unlawful enrichment at the expense of taxpayers. “Sharper unlawfully enriched himself by improperly obtaining taxpayer funds meant to assist Americans struggling during the COVID-19 pandemic,” D’Esposito said, emphasizing the breach of trust involved.
This incident is especially disheartening as it highlights the potential for corruption when officials exploit systems intended to provide emergency assistance to those in dire need. The pandemic unemployment program expanded eligibility to include freelancers and gig workers, but applicants were required to certify they met specific criteria. Sharper allegedly failed to meet those criteria while receiving benefits.
The implications of these allegations extend beyond Sharper himself; they raise significant questions about oversight and accountability within state government. The Georgia General Assembly is now under increased scrutiny as the state grapples with the fallout from these events. Sharper is not isolated in this; he joins at least two other Democratic members facing charges related to similar conduct. Former Rep. Karen L. Bennett has pleaded guilty to making false claims for unemployment benefits, while Rep. Sharon Henderson is currently under indictment for comparable actions.
With estimates from the Department of Labor suggesting that $76 billion in unemployment funds may have been improperly paid out during the pandemic, the need for stricter verification protocols and greater accountability becomes evident. During times of crisis, when quick access to funds is necessary, systems can falter and leave pathways open for abuse. The alleged actions by Sharper and others serve as a glaring reminder of the vulnerabilities present when emergency assistance programs are rushed into effect.
The investigation’s findings may prompt calls for heightened internal controls, increased scrutiny, and perhaps even external audits of officials during national emergencies. As the federal government continues to pursue fraudulent claims, it is clear that public officials must be held to the highest standards of integrity.
As proceedings against Sharper move forward, residents within his district are left to reckon with the ramifications of his actions. Many in District 177 are working-class families who were affected heavily by the pandemic. The idea that their representative exploited funds meant to assist those struggling strikes at the core of community trust.
The public’s faith is shaken when elected officials violate the principles they swore to uphold. The ongoing investigations into these cases are essential to restoring confidence in government. As Inspector General Lange poignantly noted, “What faith can the public have when those sworn to protect them steal from the very programs meant to help?” The stakes are high, and the consequences of such betrayal could last long beyond any courtroom decision.
"*" indicates required fields
