A recent release of documents regarding Jeffrey Epstein has once again revealed troubling connections between a Democratic Congress member and the convicted sex offender. Congressional Delegate Stacey Plaskett, representing the U.S. Virgin Islands, has emerged as a central figure in these discoveries. The emails from 2014 show Plaskett arranging to visit Epstein’s private island, despite his prior conviction for sex crimes in Florida. “Will you be able to meet with Jeffrey on his island on Monday Aug. 18th at 11 am?” reads one inquiry from an Epstein assistant.
The documents reveal this relationship extended well beyond 2014. In 2017, Epstein’s assistant Lesley Groff set up a “phone date” between him and Plaskett. Groff’s message in 2016 indicates that Epstein tried to contact her multiple times without success. Plaskett’s brief response confirmed she spoke with Epstein soon after receiving Groff’s encouragement.
Furthermore, Plaskett’s outreach to Epstein did not stop at casual conversation. The newly found files show her soliciting campaign donations from him in 2017 and 2018, further intertwining their connections. A text from September 2018 captures this sentiment, where she expresses gratitude for Epstein’s support while noting how busy he is. “Thanks so much for taking time and sharing ideas and thoughts. I appreciate your support and hope I’m not presumptuous to consider you a friend,” she wrote. Epstein’s reply, “Privileged to be called friend,” raises eyebrows about the depth of their relationship.
As the documents unfolded, correspondence continued even after Epstein’s apprehension. For instance, on May 13, 2019, he sent Plaskett a birthday greeting. She seemed surprised by his awareness of the date, prompting Epstein’s playful response, “You told me when you were in my office.” The exchanges during official congressional business also raise concerns. During a hearing in February 2019, Epstein sent Plaskett compliments on her appearance and even asked about her chewing habits while she was on camera.
Such communications caught the attention of Republican lawmakers. Rep. Ralph Norman, in discussing the implications of Plaskett’s interactions, emphasized the need for accountability. “No one who turns to a convicted predator for input on how to conduct official business… should sit on the Intelligence Committee or any committee, for that matter,” he argued. This reflects an underlying sentiment among critics about the integrity of Congress and the responsibilities of its members. The House’s attempt to censure Plaskett ultimately failed, illustrating the challenges in addressing ethical concerns related to high-profile figures in politics.
The revelations surrounding Plaskett underscore the complex dynamics at play within political networks. Connecting with individuals like Epstein, who have a notorious background, raises questions about judgment and the ramifications of such relationships on public trust. The unfolding narrative serves as a reminder of the fine line between political engagement and ethical boundaries, challenging the integrity of those who represent the public.
"*" indicates required fields
