Maryland Governor Wes Moore’s narrative about his family’s past has come under scrutiny, raising questions about the accuracy of his claims. Moore has often recounted a dramatic story involving his great-grandfather, Rev. James Thomas, asserting that the family fled to Jamaica due to threats from the Ku Klux Klan. This narrative, which fits seamlessly into his political rise, paints a picture of resilience against racial terror in America.
In his 2014 memoir, Moore shared this story, and it has since become a hallmark of his public persona. He reiterated it in a recent Time Magazine interview, stating, “I am literally the grandson of someone who was run out of this country by the Ku Klux Klan.” His words connect personal history to broader themes of struggle and triumph, especially considering he is the first Black governor of Maryland.
However, a report from The Washington Free Beacon challenges the foundations of Moore’s tale. Historical evidence indicates that his great-grandfather’s departure from South Carolina in 1924 was not a hasty escape from Klan violence, but rather a formal transfer within the Protestant Episcopal Church. This contradicts the urgent narrative Moore has been telling, which suggests fear and violence drove the family’s move.
Amy Evenson, an archivist with the Episcopal Archives, provided clarity on the situation. She explained that a transfer like Thomas’s involved several parties, implying cooperation rather than fear. “Typically, when a clergy member moves from one diocese to another, it is at the request of the clergy member,” she noted, highlighting the orderly nature of Thomas’s transfer.
Moore’s spokesperson, Ammar Moussa, responded to the inquiry from Fox News Digital by stating, “We’re not going to litigate a family’s century-old oral history with a partisan outlet.” He emphasized the ongoing realities of intimidation and racial terror in that era, mentioning even Bishop William Alexander Guerry, who faced deadly consequences for his advocacy for racial equality.
Moussa’s remarks underscore an important context: while public records may diverge from Moore’s storytelling, the historical climate of racial violence and intimidation in the Jim Crow South is undeniable. Yet, the legitimacy of individual stories matters in the realm of public service.
Moore’s narrative has certainly shaped how he communicates his identity and political mission. As historical narratives evolve, the expectation for accuracy and honesty in public life becomes increasingly essential. This case represents a broader dialogue about the responsibilities of public figures to uphold factual integrity while honoring the complexities of their stories.
"*" indicates required fields
