Over the past few decades, narratives surrounding renewable energy, particularly solar and wind power, have evolved into a recurring theme in energy discussions. Yet, many of these assertions are misleading. The claim that renewable sources are cheaper than traditional energy has been proven false time and time again.
When the government began promoting renewable energy over twenty years ago, it presented wind and solar as emerging technologies requiring support to compete against established sources like coal and natural gas. This characterization was inaccurate. Wind and solar technologies have existed for centuries; wind turbines date back hundreds of years, and the first solar panel emerged in 1883. Even during their early development, they struggled to compete economically and remain reliant on favorable conditions—namely, weather patterns and time of day.
As more wind and solar energy has been integrated into the national grid, the system has become less reliable, resulting in a rise in blackouts. This pattern underscores the essential role of government interventions, which have propped up these technologies through incentives and guaranteed returns for developers. Instead of competing in a fair market, these industries thrive under a framework designed to make them profitable, effectively skewing the perception of their competitiveness.
A critical examination of renewable power shows a different story. While recent headlines tout renewable sources as the fastest-growing in the U.S., they wrongly attribute this growth solely to cost competitiveness. A study published in the journal Energy provides clarity with its analysis of the Levelized Full System Costs of Electricity (LFCOE). This analysis factors in various costs associated with electricity generation, presenting a stark picture: solar energy is up to ten times more expensive than natural gas and over four times costlier than coal. While wind energy fares slightly better, its costs still reflect a significant premium over traditional fossil fuels, particularly in a state like Texas—often heralded as a success of renewables.
The situation in Texas serves as a clear case study. Once known for having the lowest electricity rates in the country, Texas has seen rates surge as reliance on coal has diminished—forced by government regulations—while investments in wind and solar have soared. As coal generation halved over the last decade, the state has experienced increased rates of power outages and energy emergencies, including during periods of low demand in the winter months.
Data from the Electric Reliability Council of Texas illustrates the sporadic nature of renewables. For instance, in late January, solar energy, despite comprising about 20% of the state’s capacity, produced only 2% of the power during peak demand times. On a different day, when solar output increased to 35%, wind power dropped significantly, indicating the inconsistency inherent in renewable generation.
Moreover, the much-publicized battery backup systems, touted as a solution for outages, drew energy from the grid during this power shortage, contradicting their intended purpose. As the sun goes down, these batteries require recharging, exacerbating the demand for reliable power sources.
Academic institutions, media outlets, and government officials continue to propagate the myth of cheap renewable electricity, yet the statistics tell a different tale. States that rely heavily on coal or hydropower have some of the lowest energy rates in the nation. Conversely, states with aggressive renewable energy mandates grapple with soaring electricity prices.
The trends are clear: the integration of more renewables correlates with escalating costs and greater incidence of blackouts. The politicians advancing these policies should face the facts rather than maintain a narrative that misrepresents the reality of energy affordability. The energy crisis is a direct outcome of these misguided policies, and only by reassessing their commitment to these “green fantasies” can they hope to resolve the issue of skyrocketing electricity costs.
"*" indicates required fields
