In a striking departure from the prevailing sentiment in Maryland, the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County has made headlines with its recent resolution. On February 10, the board passed a resolution that openly commends and supports Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. This act stands out in stark contrast to the eight counties and ten cities identified as “sanctuary” jurisdictions under the Trump Administration, pointing to a notable divergence in local governance.
Washington County, nestled in the western part of Maryland and bordering West Virginia, appears to have a different ethos guiding its decisions. The resolution outlines a commitment to collaboration between local police, state police, and federal immigration authorities, emphasizing that “ongoing cooperation” is vital for ensuring the safety and security of all citizens and legal residents. The message is clear: the commissioners aim to uphold law and order, prioritizing the enforcement of immigration laws while asserting the importance of dignity and compassion in their approach.
The resolution’s language is unequivocal. It states, “The Board of County Commissioners of Washington County hereby declares its intent to support DHS and ICE in the enforcement of our nation’s borders.” This phrasing signals not just a passive approval but an active endorsement of federal immigration enforcement efforts. The commissioners are sending a clear signal that they stand behind the federal authorities tasked with safeguarding immigration law and the integrity of the nation’s borders.
Further, the resolution expresses a unified front among local law enforcement, stating, “The Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Maryland, hereby expresses its full support for DHS and ICE, the Washington County Sheriff’s Office, and local municipal law enforcement agencies in their efforts to maintain public safety and uphold the rule of law.” Such a statement reinforces the bond between federal and local agencies, fostering a sense of shared responsibility in law enforcement.
The decision also carries implications for the relationship between local governance and federal mandates. By declaring full support for ICE operations, Washington County positions itself as a county that prioritizes cooperation over conflict in matters of immigration. This contrasts starkly with the approach adopted by many urban areas across the United States, where local jurisdictions often resist federal immigration enforcement.
The board’s resolution emphasizes the necessity of this partnership: “The Board of County Commissioners encourages ongoing cooperation and partnership between federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.” Such cooperation, according to the resolution, is critical for ensuring public safety—an assertion that resonates deeply in communities concerned about crime and safety.
The commissioners’ commitment does not end with the resolution’s passage. They further pledge to communicate their decision to federal and local authorities, asserting their intent to be an active participant in enforcing American immigration laws. This intention, encapsulated in the statement that copies will be sent to agencies like DHS and ICE, signifies a proactive approach in affirming their stance.
In conclusion, the resolution passed by the Washington County Board of Commissioners is a bold declaration of support for ICE and federal immigration enforcement. By taking this stand, the board underscores a vision of governance that prioritizes law and order, aiming to foster a secure environment for all residents. Such actions will likely stimulate discussions within the state and across the nation about the role of local authorities in the ongoing debate over immigration policy. The meeting’s eruption in jeers—captured vividly in a reported video—highlights the contentious nature of this topic, showcasing the passionate responses it elicits.
"*" indicates required fields
