A bold move is unfolding in Montana as the state’s governor and attorney general confront local sanctuary policies. Governor Greg Gianforte and Attorney General Austin Knudsen, both Republicans, are launching an investigation into the city of Helena. Their focus is a recent resolution passed by the Helena City Commissioners that restricts cooperation with federal immigration enforcement—an action Gianforte views as a direct violation of state law.
This initiative stems from a statewide ban on sanctuary cities, a law aimed at ensuring that local and state authorities do not impede immigration enforcement. “In Montana, we don’t tolerate defiance, and we support our law enforcement officers,” Gianforte emphasized in statements to Fox News Digital. The investigation will scrutinize Helena and send a clear warning to all local governments in Montana. “If you are found to be in violation of state law, there will be penalties,” he stated, underscoring the seriousness of the investigation.
The move aligns with Senate Bill 200, which allows the state to impose civil legal actions and fines against jurisdictions that violate the sanctuary city ban. This legislation empowers state leaders to act decisively against local policies perceived as obstructing federal efforts. Gianforte expressed concern about Helena’s recent actions, framing them as a potential threat to law enforcement operations designed to secure the border. “This resolution is clearly designed to obstruct federal law enforcement operations,” he noted, reflecting a cautious stance against local governance seen as overstepping its bounds.
In his correspondence with Knudsen, Gianforte pointed to the broader context of national immigration policy, linking it to the legacy of former President Donald Trump. He alluded to the challenges faced by immigration agents in recent times, suggesting local policies like Helena’s could put them at risk. “Securing the border has been a top priority of President Donald J. Trump,” he reminded, arguing that past lax immigration measures led to significant unauthorized entries into the U.S. This framing contextualizes the urgency of the situation in Montana, enhancing the call for strict adherence to federal immigration laws.
Helena’s city officials, however, are standing their ground. A spokeswoman for the city stated that they have not communicated with Gianforte about the investigation, maintaining the resolution was “drafted with careful consideration of applicable local, state, and federal law.” The city asserts confidence in its stance, positioning itself as compliant with legal requirements while resisting pressure from the state. Helena’s approach highlights a tension between local governance and state authority, which could indicate broader trends across the nation.
Further complicating the investigation, officials in Missoula, Montana’s second-largest city, are also in the spotlight. Reports suggest there may be concerns about their policies, despite a spokesperson stating Missoula is not considered a sanctuary city and that its police do not inquire about immigration status. This development shows that scrutiny surrounding immigration policies is expanding, creating a complex landscape for local jurisdictions navigating state and federal expectations.
Overall, the investigation led by Gianforte and Knudsen represents a significant assertion of state power over local decisions regarding immigration policy. As they move forward with their inquiry, the outcomes will likely resonate beyond Helena, potentially shaping governance in other Montana cities and influencing the state’s legal framework regarding immigration enforcement. The sentiment shared by Gianforte and Knudsen emphasizes a commitment to upholding state law, signaling a steadfast approach to immigration enforcement that prioritizes collaboration with federal agencies.
"*" indicates required fields
