Former President Barack Obama’s presidential center in Chicago is facing renewed criticism, particularly regarding its architectural design. The focus of discontent is the confounding text that wraps around the top of the building. Lee Bay, a Chicago Sun-Times architecture critic, weighed in on X, stating, “The new letters — an excerpt from Obama’s Selma speech — are tough read to me, giving off the lorem ipsum vibes.” His comment has sparked a wave of mockery among local residents and conservatives, highlighting how the design has seemingly missed the mark.
The presidential center, which encompasses a library, athletic facilities, and a museum, is set to open in June. However, its path to completion has been fraught with delays, including lawsuits and extensive federal reviews. This latest critique seems to underscore ongoing concerns about the design elements that have impacted its public image. The center features a towering 225-foot museum section adorned with an excerpt from Obama’s significant speech marking the 50th anniversary of Bloody Sunday. This moment in civil rights history galvanized support for the Voting Rights Act, but the presentation of the text has now drawn a different kind of attention.
Following Bay’s observation, the online reactions were swift and scathing. One user derisively compared the structure to a “Klingon prison,” while others struggled to make sense of the text’s presentation, providing mock versions that further illustrated the confusion. Logan Dobson, vice president of Targeted Victory, demonstrated this disconnect by posting a nonsensical jumble simulating how the text appears to him. Salena Zito, a journalist, chimed in, adding, “The dyslexic in me is not amused,” expressing frustration with the design.
The chatter didn’t stop there. Social media users weighed in with additional jest and critique. Comments ranged from dismissing the text’s visibility to slamming the overall design as resembling a “WW2-era German anti-aircraft tower.” It’s evident that many locals were left questioning the aesthetic choices behind what is meant to be a significant cultural landmark. One Chicago photojournalist noted that while the text might appear decent from certain angles, it fails to deliver a coherent experience for onlookers.
Though some found merit in the center’s architecture and the promise of green spaces, broader concerns about gentrification dominate the conversation. Acknowledging the complex nature of the building’s impact on the South Side, one user commented, “It actually does look good,” before shifting focus to rising house prices and the ongoing changes to the neighborhood.
The Obama Foundation, which has promoted the center as a “lively community hub, economic anchor, and beacon of democracy,” has celebrated the construction progress since its inception. The installation of the speech text is slated for late 2025, yet the burgeoning issues around gentrification and the design’s aesthetics may linger far longer than that.
Critics continue to express skepticism, but it seems the building is positioned to spark further discussions about architecture, community identity, and the responsibility the foundation holds in its local context. The juxtaposition between its ambitious ideals and the reality faced by residents remains a contentious topic, ensuring that the Obama presidential center stays in the spotlight, both for its promises and its pitfalls.
"*" indicates required fields
