A recent investigation sheds light on the financial activities of Coefficient Giving, previously known as Open Philanthropy, highlighting its extensive funding of progressive causes, particularly those related to criminal justice reform and immigration policy. Primarily backed by billionaire Dustin Moskovitz and his wife, Cari Tuna, the organization has faced criticism for allegedly supporting radical projects over the years.
The shift from Open Philanthropy to Coefficient Giving included a notable restructuring of their priorities, particularly a move away from what they termed criminal justice reform. This area is now overseen by a split-off group named Just Impact. Throughout its history, Open Philanthropy disbursed hundreds of grants to groups that many perceive as far-left, including JustLeadershipUSA and Color of Change. These organizations have drawn attention for their strong advocacy against traditional law enforcement practices.
One significant donation from Open Philanthropy was to the Alliance for Safety and Justice, receiving a hefty $11.75 million through three contributions from 2016 to 2018. This organization pushes for alternatives to incarceration, aligning with a broader agenda that critiques the existing criminal justice framework. Many supporters tout this as a means to enhance community safety, but Curtis Schube, director of research and policy at the Center to Advance Security in America, argues that such funding undermines societal safety: “These aims are the opposite of social welfare,” he stated. Schube holds that these initiatives could harm communities rather than help them.
Open Philanthropy has also openly funded groups calling for the defunding of police and the abolition of ICE. For example, the Free Migration Project, which advocates for the complete elimination of ICE, received funds alongside Color of Change, which has actively campaigned for significant cuts to police budgets. The rhetoric surrounding these donations often frames traditional law enforcement as oppressive, with narratives likening the U.S. criminal justice system to slavery.
DeAnna Hoskins, the president of JustLeadershipUSA, has positioned the call to defund police as a crucial step towards investing in community protection over law enforcement, stating, “It’s about a divestment from law and order to an investment in protection in thriving communities.” This perspective is echoed by multiple organizations funded by Open Philanthropy, emphasizing a shift from punitive measures to restorative community practices.
The funding initiatives have not gone unnoticed by broader societal groups and citizens. There is a palpable tension between those who advocate for reform through community-based programs and those who argue that dismantling or defunding police would lead to greater disorder. The nuances of this debate are evident in statements made by grassroots organizations that demand thorough changes in policing practices, insisting that incremental reforms cannot amend the entrenched problems of police violence.
Notably, while Open Philanthropy primarily directed its funding towards progressive entities, they also allocated money to some conservative organizations—evidence that their financial outreach was not solely one-sided. However, critics maintain that the overwhelming majority of their donations support a progressive agenda that seeks to radically alter the landscape of law enforcement and immigration policy.
The changes announced by Coefficient Giving regarding its funding direction raise questions about the long-term implications of such financial backing. For many, the notion that philanthropic funding could significantly reshape public policy and community safety casts a shadow on the institutions it aims to influence. As the organization’s journey continues, the impact of their donations will likely be scrutinized, both for their intentions and the real-world consequences faced by communities across America.
This situation underscores a larger trend within philanthropy: the increasing influence of wealthy individuals on political discourse. The motivations behind significant financial contributions often come into question, especially when the funds fuel controversies surrounding public safety and justice reforms. As these discussions unfold, the role of philanthropic organizations like Coefficient Giving in shaping societal norms and legal frameworks remains at the forefront.
"*" indicates required fields
