Bono is back in the spotlight, and not for good reasons. The longtime frontman of U2 seems intent on using his fame to lecture the public yet again about his interpretation of the world. His latest single, “American Obituary,” is intended as a protest anthem against the Trump administration’s immigration policies. However, it feels more like a limp attempt to recapture relevance after a long career marked by mediocre musical output and self-serving activism.
In the new song, Bono attempts to weave a narrative around the tragic incident involving Renee Good, who was shot by a federal agent. Yet, he skims over crucial details. As noted, Good was attempting to strike the officer with her vehicle when shot. This is not just a minor detail; it fundamentally changes the portrayal of events. But rather than acknowledge the complexity of the situation, Bono resorts to oversimplifying it to fuel anti-Trump sentiments. Such an approach does little more than fan the flames of division and outrage.
Bono’s narrative is representative of a broader trend among many celebrities to align themselves with causes pushed by wealthy benefactors, ignoring the realities on the ground. For decades, the singer has been a fixture at high-profile gatherings, mostly aligning with billionaires to discuss global issues while flying around in private jets—an irony that he seems blissfully unaware of. He speaks passionately about saving the world while comfortably nestled in the upper echelons of wealth and fame, a stark contradiction that undermines his message.
Given his almost four-decade career, Bono’s relevance in the music industry has dwindled. Most concertgoers today attend his shows to hear hits from the 1980s, not his recent material. His 2014 attempt to have Apple’s software automatically download his latest album on people’s devices was met with widespread backlash. This reflects a clear truth: people simply aren’t clamoring for his new music.
When comparing Bono to contemporaries like Morrissey, it becomes evident that Bono is more of a mouthpiece for the left’s agenda than a genuine artist. Morrissey has faced significant pushback from the music industry for his outspoken views, which defend Western values and critique Islamic terrorism. Bono, on the other hand, has carefully navigated the expectations of those in charge, ensuring that his voice aligns with the prevailing progressive narrative.
This dynamic reveals a troubling reality for artists. The industry seems to favor a stampede towards leftist ideology, often at the expense of genuine discourse. Bono’s latest efforts to position himself as a voice for Gen Z feel forced and hollow. His attempts to reclaim the mantle of cultural relevance come across as disingenuous, laden with the emptiness of a manufactured moral outrage.
As he takes center stage once again, it may be best for Bono to refrain from injecting himself into political debates. The country can make its judgments just fine without his input. His decades-long track record of thinly veiled posturing has worn thin. The protest music of the past was deeply rooted in genuine anger and cultural context. Bono’s contributions seem far removed from that, resembling more of a self-indulgent echo than a profound message.
With his continued influence over pop culture, it is time to reconsider the validity of his role as a moral arbiter. Bono has largely failed in this self-appointed capacity, and as the world continues to shift and evolve, perhaps it’s time for his tepid influence to fade away. The message seems clear: true art is about authenticity, something Bono has struggled to maintain in a landscape that desperately needs genuine voices.
"*" indicates required fields
