Recent announcements regarding two judges stepping down from the U.S. Court of Appeals provide President Donald Trump with an opportunity to further shape the federal judiciary. Chief Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton of the Sixth Circuit and Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston of the Second Circuit have announced their intentions to take senior status later this year. Both judges were appointed by President George W. Bush, and their departure opens the door for new appointments.
Senior status effectively functions as a semi-retirement for judges, allowing them to take on a reduced workload while creating a vacancy for a new appointee. The implications of these vacancies are substantial. The Sixth Circuit already has a Republican-appointed majority, but the Second Circuit presents a more critical situation with a one-seat Democrat-appointed advantage. This makes it ripe for a conservative appointment, which could significantly influence rulings on vital issues such as financial regulation and national security, as highlighted by Just the News.
Trump’s judicial appointment track record shows momentum. According to the Heritage Foundation’s Judicial Appointments Tracker, he appointed 26 federal judges last year, outperforming both Joe Biden and Barack Obama during their initial years in office. Although Trump had already filled 19 judicial positions by this point in his first term, the current pace appears faster despite the competitive political landscape.
Yet, a note of caution arises. Politico recently reported that the bulk of Trump’s current appointments are at the district court level, leaving fewer prestigious appeals court vacancies compared to 2017. This shift is due to a reduced number of available appeals court slots, now down to about 40, compared to over 100 when Trump first took office. It signals a more challenging environment for impactful judicial influence in this term.
Russell Wheeler, a senior fellow at Brookings, asserts that the current judicial climate will not mirror the transformative changes witnessed during Trump’s first four years. He notes, “This is not going to be the same kind of earth-shaking four years…,” indicating that the hurdles Trump’s administration faces are markedly different this time.
The importance of vacancies left by judges like Sutton and Livingston cannot be overstated. Both incoming appointees will require Senate confirmation, but the political dynamics have shifted. Biden appointed 228 judges during his term, surpassing Trump’s total of 226 appointments in his first term; however, Trump still leads in the appeals court appointments with 54 compared to Biden’s 45.
The ongoing battle over judicial appointments extends beyond mere numbers. There was considerable pressure within Democratic circles to convince Justice Stephen Breyer to retire, allowing for an opportunity to appoint Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. This strategic maneuvering reflects the high stakes involved in court appointments and the palpable tension surrounding them.
One moment from Jackson’s confirmation hearing stands out, illustrating the contentious nature of the dialogue surrounding judicial appointments. When asked to define the word ‘woman’, Jackson replied, “No, I can’t,” asserting, “I’m not a biologist.” This exchange not only sparked widespread debate but further highlighted the polarized perspectives on social issues that guide today’s judicial conversations.
As Trump aims to make his mark once again, these upcoming appointments will be a litmus test for the administration’s ambitions in reshaping the judiciary against a backdrop of fierce political divisions.
"*" indicates required fields
