Sacramento County Sheriff Jim Cooper has expressed outrage over the decision to grant parole to David Allen Funston, a convicted serial child molester. Funston, who has a history of horrific crimes against young children, was labeled “the monster parents fear most” by a judge during his sentencing. Despite receiving three consecutive 25-to-life terms in 1999, Funston is being considered for release under California’s Elderly Parole Program, raising alarms about the leniency of this law.
At 64, Funston qualifies for consideration after serving 27 years of his sentence. The Elderly Parole Program allows inmates over the age of 50 who have served at least 20 years to apply for parole if they are not sentenced to death or life without parole. During a press conference, Sheriff Cooper condemned both the parole board and Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration for this troubling decision. He described the program as “sick and broken” and highlighted the serious implications for public safety.
Cooper’s frustration stems from the nature of Funston’s crimes. Funston targeted children aged three to seven during his abominable acts. He would lure victims with candy and toys, only to commit unspeakable acts of violence against them, including kidnapping and molestation. Cooper recounted the distressing details of these offenses, emphasizing how Funston’s actions have irreparably damaged the lives of the victims. The sheriff stated, “He stole their childhoods,” referring to the trauma inflicted on innocent children.
In a powerful stir of anger, Cooper demanded accountability for the parole board’s decision. He noted, “There are some folks that deserve a second chance in life. Someone that does these type of things? They don’t deserve a second chance.” His remarks reflect a broader societal concern regarding the treatment of sex offenders, particularly those who prey on children.
The law that enabled Funston’s eligibility for parole has sparked debates about its implications for public safety. Critics argue that allowing such offenders the opportunity for early release sends a dangerous message about the severity of their crimes. Cooper pointed out that California is currently facing numerous battles when it comes to protecting its children. He called for urgent reform, stating, “Someone has to speak up about it, and we’ve got to change this.”
Cooper’s statements resonate with the fear and frustration many feel as they witness changes in policies governing the criminal justice system. His emphasis on the need for vigilance in safeguarding children from predators is clear. As he put it, “What are we coming to as a society here in California, that it’s okay with this to let him out?”
The issue of Funston’s potential release is not just a singular case; it reflects a larger narrative about how society handles child predators and the complexities of criminal justice reform. Public sentiment tends to lean toward stricter measures against those who commit such heinous acts, and Cooper’s outspoken criticism highlights the growing concern among law enforcement and community members alike.
As California continues to grapple with the implications of its parole laws, the case of David Allen Funston serves as a stark reminder of the challenges ahead in protecting vulnerable populations, particularly children. Sheriff Cooper’s impassioned plea for change underlines the imperative for action to prevent similar outcomes in the future. With rising concerns about child safety, the pathway forward will likely demand reassessment and reform of existing laws to reflect the gravity of these offenses.
"*" indicates required fields
