The article presents a reflective take on the intersection of faith and technology, especially in regard to artificial intelligence. The author expresses concern over humanity’s shift toward AI as a modern-day substitute for spiritual guidance. This sentiment resonates as the piece explores how the sacred act of worship may become diluted when mediated by technology.
The author opens with a striking proposition: without a chosen faith, an individual will inevitably find themselves worshiping something else—in this case, AI. “If you don’t choose a religion, a religion will choose you,” reads the clear warning. This statement encapsulates a significant cultural shift, where technology, rather than traditional beliefs, becomes the central focus for many individuals. The comparison of AI to “false idols” raises questions about the depth of faith in a digital age.
The evocative imagery of AI mimicking religious language underscores the stakes involved. When the author logs onto their computer and hears voices calling to “follow,” it feels disorienting. The very act of seeking divine wisdom—the words of Jesus—now competes with the instant accessibility provided by machines. This conflict generates a profound inner dialogue, highlighting a tension between devotion and convenience. The author admits to an almost instinctive need to reach for technology to find scripture. Yet, underlying this convenience is a creeping unease about everything that is lost in that transaction.
As the author notes, AI’s impressive capabilities often mirror a certain omniscience. However, they pause to remind the reader that AI draws its knowledge from the very people it serves. “But then, where did it get what it knows?” they ask, prompting reflection on both the reliability of AI’s insights and the origins of spiritual understanding. This parallel teaches us about the communication of faith, tracing back to the time when stories were shared orally before being transcribed by hand—with each step in technology shaping how faith itself is understood and disseminated.
The evolution of sharing scripture parallels our relationship with AI and raises important considerations about community. The author laments the loss of human connection that occurs when questions can be answered in isolation via technology. “What about the wonder that comes when I’m with other believers in church?” they ask, highlighting that personal encounters in shared spaces enrich the spiritual journey in ways that a computer cannot replicate.
The author reflects on a personal experience with memory loss attributed to over-reliance on technology. A notable point is when they reminisce about remembering phone numbers—a fading skill in the face of smartphones. This narrative illustrates how technology transforms habits and affects cognition and spiritual fitness. Just as Jesus withdrew to the wilderness for reflection and dependence on God, this moment calls for a similar retreat from distractions—a surrender to the divine that a screen cannot facilitate.
Toward the piece’s conclusion, the author contemplates what Jesus might say about AI. They acknowledge that while technology has potential benefits, it lacks the profound spiritual depth that only connection with the divine can provide. “AI may seem all-knowing,” they insightfully remark, “yet it is in unknowing that we come to know Jesus.” This assertion invites a necessary conversation about the true nature of knowledge and understanding, beyond mere data and algorithms.
In the final call to action, the author reflects deeply, encouraging a moment of stillness away from devices—urging readers to listen for Jesus’s love rather than relying on the sterile outputs of AI. The message is clear: technology, while useful, must not overshadow authentic, soul-deep encounters that foster spiritual growth. As they express, “I can close my eyes and speak to the heavens.” This personal plea underscores the core theme of the article—reaffirming human connection with the divine above all, showcasing that worship and faith transcend the capabilities of any machine.
"*" indicates required fields
