Michigan Democratic Representative Shri Thanedar is making headlines with his proposed legislation, the “Abolish ICE Act.” Announced on January 9, 2026, the bill aims to dismantle the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, making a bold statement that has drawn attention from both supporters and critics.
Thanedar officially began the legislative process on January 15 under the bill number H.R. 7123. It has already been sent to key committees: the Judiciary, the Homeland Security, and the Ways and Means Committees. For this legislation to become law, it requires bipartisan support and, ultimately, the signature of President Donald Trump. Given the Trump administration’s strong defense of ICE, the odds appear slim for its passage.
The Representative has not shied away from vocal criticism of federal immigration policies. He represents Michigan’s 13th District, which covers Detroit and the Downriver area, a region significantly impacted by immigration enforcement issues. His previous actions include filing multiple articles of impeachment against Trump, reflecting his ongoing disdain for the administration’s handling of immigration. His stance was echoed when he called out former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem for misleading Congress during a recent hearing.
In crafting the “Abolish ICE Act,” Thanedar cited a grim incident involving Renee Nicole Good, who was killed by ICE agents following a confrontation. He claimed, “Americans are being terrorized,” and argued that the agency has prioritized “aggressive enforcement and violence” over due process since its inception in 2003. He positioned this legislation as a necessary step toward addressing what he sees as the out-of-control nature of ICE.
Thanedar stated, “We can do this without ICE,” emphasizing a vision for a different framework in immigration enforcement. He criticized the agency for its perceived militaristic tactics, saying, “We do not need the murders. We do not need this paramilitary organization’s members on our streets terrorizing U.S. citizens, terrorizing moms and terrorizing our children.”
This sentiment resonates with other members of the Democratic Party. Representative Ilhan Omar, who represents the area where Good was killed, has condemned ICE, describing it as an “occupying force” that operates in a “lawless” manner. Additional proposals have emerged from Democrats seeking to limit funding to ICE, with some legislators, like Representative Ro Khanna, calling for a halt to budget increases for the agency.
Thanedar’s effort is met with skepticism from opponents who question his qualifications. One social media commentator challenged his ability to make decisions on U.S. immigration policy due to his language proficiency, claiming, “Should a foreign born dude who struggles with our language really be calling the shots on U.S. immigration?”
The discourse surrounding the “Abolish ICE Act” highlights ongoing tensions in U.S. immigration policy. With various Democratic voices resonating similar concerns, the proposal represents a significant stance against ICE and calls into question the current framework of immigration enforcement. Whether this legislative effort will gain traction remains uncertain, but it serves as a reflection of the deep divisions over immigration in American politics today.
"*" indicates required fields
