Law enforcement in Vermont is voicing strong concerns after a local prosecutor opted not to charge six individuals involved in a violent confrontation with police during a protest against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions. Chittenden County State’s Attorney Sarah George determined that the circumstances did not warrant filing charges, which has led to backlash from police and public safety officials.
In her statement, George acknowledged that some protesters crossed the line from civil disobedience into violent behavior. “I am confident that some protesters escalated the situation and went beyond civil disobedience into unacceptable and perhaps criminal behavior,” she said. Despite this recognition, she expressed reluctance to prosecute the six individuals due to their lack of prior criminal history. George suggested that it would be unjust to place the blame solely on them for the day’s events. In her view, law enforcement also played a role in escalating tensions. “So to charge these six individuals with no criminal records, and expect that they bear the burden of all the harm caused that day — is not something I was interested in our office being a part of,” she stated.
This perspective has not resonated well with local law enforcement. The Burlington Police Department issued a statement acknowledging the harm caused by the ICE operation but underscored the necessity of upholding the rule of law. “Engaging in physical confrontations with law enforcement in the street is not protected speech or expressive conduct under the First Amendment,” they said.
The events leading to this controversy unfolded on March 11, 2026, when ICE agents were attempting to execute an operation to apprehend an illegal immigrant. The situation escalated when a protester damaged ICE vehicles and a bystander’s car. As ICE secured a warrant to enter the residence where the suspect had fled, an intense standoff ensued between law enforcement and protesters. The altercation included attempts to impede ICE’s vehicles, including slashing a tire.
In light of George’s decision not to pursue charges, Vermont Public Safety Commissioner Jennifer Morrison and Vermont State Police Director Col. Matthew Birmingham issued a sharp critique. They expressed concern that this decision might embolden individuals at public gatherings to obstruct police efforts in the future. “This is a disheartening decision that sets a dangerous precedent,” they warned, highlighting a disconnect between George’s vision for justice and their understanding of public safety.
They went on to note that the prosecutor had missed a critical opportunity to differentiate between lawful protest and criminal actions that can harm communities. “She has missed an opportunity to delineate between the lawful conduct the First Amendment protects and the lawlessness of criminal behavior that escalates volatile situations and harms communities,” Morrison and Birmingham added.
The violent clash resulted in injuries to several Vermont State Police officers, with one suffering eye injuries from a broken window and two others being physically assaulted. However, investigations have concluded that the police did not use excessive force during the operation.
The overarching concern expressed by law enforcement officials is that George’s statements may foster a sense of impunity among individuals engaged in similar confrontations. “Lawbreakers in Chittenden County already seemed to know they can act with impunity,” Morrison and Birmingham asserted. The message from these officials is clear: accountability for actions taken during protests is essential to maintaining law and order in the community.
"*" indicates required fields
