Michael Che’s recent tirade against the writers behind “The Roast of Kevin Hart” reveals a deeper conversation about race and humor in comedy. Through his series of Instagram posts, Che pointedly criticized how different racial groups approach jokes, particularly in a roast setting. He voiced frustration over the skewed nature of the roast’s humor, highlighting a stark contrast between “black guy roast” styles and “white roasts.” He bluntly stated, “Black guy roast like, ‘look at this nigga shoes!’ White roasts are like, ‘Slavery, math, slain teens, sex crimes, slurs, family secrets.'” This observation underscores a significant cultural divide in comedic expression.
The roast, which should ideally celebrate a comedian’s career, instead saw its humor cross lines into controversial territory. Host Shane Gillis made jabs related to Hart’s height, invoking references to slavery, while fellow comedian Tony Hinchcliffe took it further with a joke about George Floyd. The use of these sensitive topics in what should be light-hearted banter highlights an uncomfortable trend in comedy: the willingness to push boundaries to provoke laughter, often at the expense of good taste.
Che’s comments hinted at his belief that the writers picked for the roast may not have fully grasped—or respected—the subject matter they were tackling. “Let’s do a roast celebrating the career of the most successful black comic in the last 10 years. I love that! Who should we get to write it?” he posted, and this pointed question holds weight. His emphasis on the all-white writing team for such a significant event raises eyebrows and serves as a critique of industry practices that fail to consider the voices and experiences that should shape the narratives being spun.
Upon following up with a photo of the five featured white writers, Che’s clear disbelief was palpable: “C’monnnnnnnnn… that’s not funny?” This captures not just disappointment in the jokes delivered, but an overarching concern that true inclusivity in comedy is lost when the pen does not reflect the stage. Despite 17 credited writers on the project, the overwhelming presence of white voices in a roast about a prominent black figure speaks volumes about the need for more diverse perspectives in the writing room.
The larger implication of Che’s criticism arrives in the context of modern comedy, particularly within racially charged environments. As seen in the roast’s edgy humor, there exists a tension between satire and insensitivity. Che’s candid remarks serve not only as commentary on the roast itself but also encourage a reexamination of who is allowed to joke about what in the cultural landscape. It raises essential questions about accountability, representation, and the responsibility comedians have in addressing race and identity through humor.
In the end, Che’s insights serve as both a call to action for the industry and a reminder of the nuanced balance required in comedic storytelling. Comedy can tackle the hardest truths, but it must also tread carefully, especially when touching upon themes that resonate deeply within particular communities. The roast of Kevin Hart was intended to be a celebratory event, yet it inadvertently shined a light on the often-disregarded complexities of race, comedy, and the writers’ room.
"*" indicates required fields
