Spencer Pratt’s recent bid for Los Angeles mayor has stirred significant backlash from Hollywood elites, particularly from “The Price is Right” host Drew Carey. Carey, known for his libertarian leanings, expressed his frustration over Pratt’s rising popularity in a profanity-laced tirade on Threads. As Pratt gains ground in the polls, closing in on the current mayor, Karen Bass, Carey’s anger appears more personal than political.
Carey’s outburst labeled Pratt as a “serial scammer without a soul or moral compass,” expressing disbelief that anyone would support Pratt’s campaign. “Anyone who votes for, or endorses Spencer Pratt for Mayor of LA needs to get their head out of their as**,” Carey declared. His attempt to position himself as a voice of reason was overshadowed by his scathing language and thinly veiled contempt for what he perceives as a misguided electorate. He concluded with, “F**k this guy already,” revealing his frustration.
However, Spencer Pratt is not one to be easily intimidated. Known for his quick wit and media savvy, he responded to Carey’s insults with sharp criticism of his own. Pratt pointed out a significant detail that adds complexity to the narrative: Carey’s name appears in the controversial Epstein files. The late financier’s ties to numerous high-profile individuals have been the subject of considerable scrutiny. Pratt’s tweet highlighted the irony in Carey’s moral high ground, tagging it with a keen observation: “Isn’t it weird how the two comedians histrionically lashing out against me are both in the ‘Epstein files’?”
This response turned the attack back on Carey and cast doubt on the integrity of his criticism. By referencing the Epstein files, Pratt effectively shifted the focus away from his own campaign and onto Carey’s past associations. It’s a strategic move that reflects Pratt’s understanding of the media landscape, where scandals often overshadow sound policy.
Carey’s reaction illustrates the entrenched divisions within Hollywood, where artists navigate a landscape of political theatrics and celebrity controversies. His denunciation of Pratt is emblematic of a broader fear among some in the entertainment industry—a fear of losing relevance and influence in a political race that has unexpected contenders.
In contrast, Pratt’s rise signals a shift towards unpredictability in local politics. His previous experiences in the reality television arena have equipped him with the skills to engage with the public and media effectively. As Hollywood insiders grapple with his unorthodox candidacy, Pratt’s survival through their scrutiny suggests a growing appetite among voters for authenticity over traditional political decorum.
The incident highlights a developing narrative in LA politics—one where the boundaries between celebrity culture and civic leadership begin to blur. With figures like Pratt challenging the status quo, it raises questions about what voters want in their leaders. Are they looking for polished politicians, or are they ready to embrace a new brand of celebrity-driven populism?
As more voices join the fray—each bringing their own controversies and narratives—Pratt’s campaign may be just the beginning of a more chaotic political environment. Hollywood’s reaction to his ascent will continue to be a spectacle, revealing the vulnerabilities of established figures like Carey and highlighting the ongoing tension between political ambition and celebrity culture.
"*" indicates required fields
