Washington insiders are expressing alarm at the upcoming meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Critics from both parties are quick to label Trump in unflattering terms, crying foul over potential deals that might compromise Ukraine or abandon American interests. They view him as just another politician, but that perception misses the essence of what drives Trump. Unlike conventional politicians, who often avoid risks to secure their positions, Trump embraces improvisation to achieve his goals.
Having worked in the Situation Room with multiple presidents, the differences in Trump’s approach stand out. He tends to focus on the end game rather than the usual political processes that concern most leaders. According to some, Trump’s background as a real estate developer—where success hinges on completing a project—fuels his urgency. As he navigates problems, whether financial, logistical, or political, he adapts to obstacles while keeping his eye on the finish line. As he famously prioritizes getting results, Trump tends to work at a breakneck pace.
Critics deride Trump as unpredictable or mercurial, but the truth is he simply operates outside standard political guidelines. Most politicians stick to their initial plans, often blinded by the fear of failure. They craft elaborate strategies, but they can become trapped by them, such as during the lengthy military engagements of the past two decades. Trump, however, appears willing to pivot when necessary. His initial charm-based diplomacy towards Putin might have faltered, leading him to adopt a pressure tactic with Ukraine’s Zelenskyy, ultimately pushing for agreements while offloading costs to European allies.
What remains unclear is what plan will emerge from the Trump-Putin meeting. The urgency to face off with Putin stems from a need to understand his true intentions. Is he genuinely seeking peace, or is he prolonging the conflict? If the meeting reveals Putin’s reluctance to negotiate, Trump may escalate to a Plan D, which could involve tightening the economic screws on Russia. History recalls that previous financial pressures led to significant shifts, as Alaska’s sale to the U.S. stemmed from Russia’s financial troubles during the Crimean War.
In this ever-evolving geopolitical landscape, Trump’s methods may defy expectations but still aim for swift resolutions in complex situations. The outcome of this meeting could significantly shape future interactions, determining whether progress is indeed achievable or if further conflict looms on the horizon.
"*" indicates required fields
