It was a striking moment on CNN as former Democrat Jillian Michaels confronted the established narratives of history during a segment that quickly turned contentious. Michaels appeared on a panel that included Abby Phillip and Democrat strategist Julie Roginsky, discussing a review of the Smithsonian Institution’s exhibits. The Trump administration’s efforts to ensure that museums highlight American unity and progress set the stage for a tense dialogue.
When Roginsky claimed that conservatives were attempting to “whitewash” history, Michaels challenged that assertion directly. “Reviewing biased exhibits isn’t erasing history; it’s removing the political propaganda baked into taxpayer-funded museums,” she firmly stated. This pivotal moment highlighted Michaels’ refusal to accept oversimplified narratives that cast all historical issues through a lens of racial blame.
As the discussion evolved, tensions escalated, particularly when Roginsky invoked slavery as a point of contention. Michaels responded with clear facts, explaining the nuances often lost in these discussions. “You cannot tie imperialism and racism and slavery to just one race,” she asserted. Her insistence on a broader historical context unsettled her opponents, with Congressman Ritchie Torres quickly labeling America’s history as a “system of white supremacy.” Michaels deftly countered this by pointing out historical facts and challenging the reductionist views presented by her fellow panelists.
Throughout the conversation, Phillip and Roginsky attempted to steer the dialogue back to racial blame, but Michaels remained steadfast. “You cannot make every single exhibit about white imperialism when it isn’t relevant at all,” she insisted. Her comments about Cuban migration were particularly pointed, revealing how political narratives often distort the realities of history. “When you talk about Cubans leaving Cuba and you make it about ‘white people bad,’ that’s not accurate,” Michaels declared, pushing back hard against a narrative that oversimplifies complex issues.
As the segment drew to a close, Michaels left no doubt about her stance. She summarized the left’s media strategy: turning everything into a racial issue and shutting down honest discussions. This confrontation not only showcased the tensions within the panel but also reflected broader societal struggles around how history is represented and understood. As Michaels succinctly put it, “Everything is racialized.” This line encapsulated the essence of her argument and underscored a significant clash of ideologies on national television.
"*" indicates required fields
