In a recent report, The Daily Signal highlighted significant achievements by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in processing disability benefits claims. According to the department, a record-breaking 2,524,115 claims had been processed by August 8, 2024, surpassing the previous year’s total. VA Secretary Doug Collins announced this achievement with pride, stating, “The backlog of Veterans waiting for benefits is now down more than 37% since January 20.”
While these claims highlight impressive figures, they come with a cautionary note from whistleblower Sonny Fleeman. He has raised concerns about the potential ramifications of performance quotas imposed on claims processors. Fleeman describes being bound by legal limits in what he can disclose, yet he believes that the pressure to meet these quotas leads to shortcuts in reviewing claims. “This forces claims processors to shortcut review of evidence,” he explained. He pointed out that this could result in erroneous decisions that necessitate appeals, thus creating a hidden backlog that the VA does not account for when it reports progress.
Fleeman has claimed that the imposed standards lack empirical support and may prioritize speed over accuracy, saying, “These arbitrary performance criteria, imposed with the threat of disciplinary action, create immense pressure.” His concerns deepen with the realization that the VA may be misrepresenting its success in reducing backlogs. “Cycling veterans’ claims through rework that never appears in the official backlog numbers conceals true systemic issues,” he argued.
In pursuing transparency, Fleeman filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to obtain internal studies and assessments justifying the productivity standards for claims processors. Unfortunately, his requests resulted in a lack of documentation, prompting him to conclude that the VA cannot substantiate these quotas with reliable data.
Adding to the gravity of the situation, Fleeman sought critical quality control metrics, including how often the VA’s initial claims decisions are disputed. The agency’s response, he noted, confirmed his fears: the data is not tracked. He emphasized the consequences of this failure, stating, “By not tracking dispute rates, leadership insulates itself from accountability.”
Fleeman described this lack of oversight as more than mere bureaucratic error. “It appears to be structural deception,” he asserted. He believes this system ultimately masks the reality of how many veterans are negatively impacted by rushed decisions. The complexity of the VA’s current claim processing achievements raises questions about their reliability and the true state of veterans’ care.
"*" indicates required fields
