A recent report from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) has raised eyebrows by changing the standards for declaring a famine. This shift coincides with ongoing tensions in the Gaza Strip related to its conflict with Israel. The IPC’s July 29 report claims the region is facing a “worst-case scenario of famine,” citing evidence of widespread starvation and malnutrition. The media, including esteemed outlets like ABC News, CNN, and The New York Times, quickly echoed this narrative, pointing to the IPC’s findings.
Notably, the IPC altered its criteria from a previous threshold of 30% malnourished children to just 15%. This 50% reduction has sparked criticism and concern. The Washington Free Beacon reported that this change allows the IPC to declare a famine more readily—something some observers view as lowering the standard for declaring such dire circumstances.
In terms of actual malnutrition rates within Gaza, the situation appears more nuanced. A chart included in the IPC’s notice reveals that less than 8% of children in Deir al-Balah and Khan Younis suffer from acute malnutrition, while 16.5% are affected in Gaza City. This latter figure is alarming but still falls short of the traditional 30% threshold that had been used consistently in previous famine assessments.
An aid worker commented on the IPC’s changed metrics, suggesting that shifting to the new standard may be akin to “lowering the bar” for declaring famine. Historically, other famine declarations, such as those for Somalia or South Sudan, relied on more stringent measurements based on weight-for-height criteria, making them harder to achieve.
Responses from various parties are telling. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has countered allegations of a starvation policy in Gaza, asserting, “If we wanted to starve, two million Gazans would not be alive today.” This stark statement draws attention to the complex realities on the ground while also emphasizing Israel’s stance. Netanyahu’s administration claims to have allowed significant food aid into Gaza, despite reports of diversion by Hamas.
A humanitarian organization, the U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, claims to have delivered nearly 122 million meals to the region. A Palestinian woman who received assistance praised the improvements, stating, “Now, we come here to collect and leave. The workers here are helpful.” This personal account provides a glimpse into how aid distribution is functioning amid the conflict.
The juxtaposition of the IPC’s report with these firsthand accounts demonstrates the complexity of the situation in Gaza. As narratives unfold, it becomes critical to examine the metrics and claims being presented, ensuring that the facts remain clear amid the noise of war and humanitarian crisis discussion.
"*" indicates required fields
